User talk:Barefoot through the chollas

Welcome!
Hello, Barefoot through the chollas, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! —  Newslinger  talk   22:47, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation pages
Hi Barefoot, just wanted to let you know that I reverted your edit to Piccolomini (disambiguation). Disambiguation pages have different guidelines than articles (the short version is here), one of which is that each entry should have a link to only one existing article. Leschnei (talk) 23:39, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Silly arbitrary rule IMO, but that's beside the point. My main purpose was to replace the non-existent Prenza with Pienza. Your solution cleaned it up nicely. Well done. Barefoot through the chollas (talk) 03:23, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Your username...
...makes me squinch. Signed, someone who has made the mistake of wearing sandals while walking near chollas and Joshuas. (It was the Joshuas I was admiring; the chollas were there for the ride.) Amazingly, nobody got hurt. --jpgordon&#x1d122;&#x1d106; &#x1D110;&#x1d107; 14:19, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Italian orthography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digraph ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Italian_orthography check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Italian_orthography?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:10, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

A couple things
Re Talk:English-language spelling reform: In requested move discussions, it is customary to indicate one's opinion, usually "Support" or "Oppose", in bold, so as to help the closer of the discussion assess the consensus. See the previous RM I linked to in the discussion for examples.

Re Tuscany: I recently started a discussion regarding the very topic of /sC/ syllabification in Italian at Help talk:IPA/Italian. Your participation would be appreciated. Nardog (talk) 04:17, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

April 2021
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Paint It Black, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. WP:BURDEN and WP:SONGTRIVIA both apply The SandDoctor  Talk 17:57, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

What I added was, a non-rude legitimate request for a reliable source: Citation needed. Barefoot through the chollas (talk) 20:40, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Tucson, Arizona, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Magnolia677 (talk) 16:22, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Magnolia677 I'm aware of guidelines, what constitutes reliable source, etc. I'm also aware that a bit of calm good judgment is fundamental in deciding when to demand sourcing for basic facts at the banal truism level, as is manifested all-but-innumerable times in the Tucson article as well as any other. Aside from cluttering the text excessively, it does no harm to source non-controversial common-knowledge observations such as "... is home to the University of Arizona", "Tucson is sometimes referred to as 'The Old Pueblo'", "The city is built along the Santa Cruz River", etc. etc. It's simply unnecessary. Those who opine otherwise are going to be very busy, indeed, either demanding sourcing of others or supplying sourcing themselves. Barefoot through the chollas (talk) 19:03, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Sol505000 (talk) 20:34, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Spanish language. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.  Salvio 20:56, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

October 2022
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Corsican language. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Jeppiz (talk) 12:05, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Username
Having lived in Tucson, AZ for 5 years (2012-2017), I cringe every time I see your user name. Ouch! XD - UtherSRG (talk) 16:52, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Ouch, indeed! The name began to come to me one day as I was attempting to do some clarifications on a Wikipedia article while seated on our patio outside the Old Pueblo. An especially cantankerous type who seemed to know somewhere between little and nothing about the topic in question seemed also to be intent on edit warring, while very selectively worshiping and citing the letter (definitely not the spirit) of Wikipedia law. I looked out over the desert beyond the garden wall -- saguaros, prickly pears, chollas... -- thinking that dealing with this guy is a bit like trying to walk barefoot in the desert. By being extremely careful, you might get only a few painful punctures, but a no-pain stroll is impossible. A few days later I signed up with an official handle, et voilà: from then on, Barefoot through the chollas (talk) 22:15, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Tuscan dialect
It is not "unlikely", it is a well known phenomenon; however I will provide a relilable source.-- Carnby (talk) 16:16, 6 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Well done. Barefoot through the chollas (talk) 22:29, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Keith Richards
Bots do not archive ongoing discussions, only after the set time period, without any activity is it archived. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 20:30, 16 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Do you even read your talk page? -  FlightTime  ( open channel ) 00:25, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * "only after the set time period, without any activity is it archived." Obviously. By whom? Barefoot through the chollas (talk) 01:10, 17 January 2024 (UTC)