User talk:Barerunner

September 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Maitland, New South Wales has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Maitland, New South Wales was changed by Barerunner (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.972096 on 2014-09-20T06:34:40+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:34, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Zhaofeng Li [ talk... contribs... ] 08:09, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Maitland, New South Wales, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Maitland, New South Wales was changed by Barerunner (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.911486 on 2014-09-21T08:12:07+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:12, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Maitland, New South Wales. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 09:58, 21 September 2014 (UTC)