User talk:Barkermichael

March 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Michael Barker (drummer) was changed by Barkermichael (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.874471 on 2013-03-24T23:17:20+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:17, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Michael Barker (drummer), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. — Mel bourne Star ☆ talk 10:25, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest
Hello, Barkermichael. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 11:03, 6 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Please note our more than three revert policy. One more reversion on this article will inevitably lead to your being blocked from editing he--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 15:00, 6 April 2013 (UTC)re.
 * Also, I assume that you are the subject of the article in question. Note that while the subject of an article is discouraged from contributing to it, ir is not forbidden; but you do not have any greater degree of editorial control than any other editor.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 15:03, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Article heavily edited
Hi, I'm an administrator here. I see you've been upset about the content of the article that appears to be about you. I've intervened and made some changes in line with our policies. Sorry you had a rough start here. Toddst1 (talk) 15:32, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Apologies
Hi,

I would like to apologise for leaving a warning on your talk page. The content you removed strayed from the focus of the article and was rightfully removed, however it's not defamatory as the content was mostly sourced. Although I didn't initially add any of the content in that section, I believe the editor that did based the statement about Barker supporting his son on the quote, "despite his support for his son's antics online" from this source. YuMaNuMa Contrib 16:10, 6 April 2013 (UTC)