User talk:Barkerpe

Welcome!
Hello, Barkerpe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! I am One of Many (talk) 06:29, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Your article has been moved to AfC space
Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Barkerpe/Transaction experience management has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Transaction experience management, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 02:16, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! j⚛e deckertalk 13:39, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Reply
Thanks for message.
 * The article was a copyright violation. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
 * The declining editor traced parts of the text to at least two Avoka pages. I don't think it is reasonable to expect us to check every line to see if it is copyright or not.


 * There are other problems, which themselves would make salvaging the article difficult
 * it did not provide adequate independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Much of the text is unsourced and it reads like original research.
 * It was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. One example of an unsourced claims presented as fact is: Organizations make lasting impressions on individuals based on how easy they are to do business with. Unpleasant, cumbersome transactions can result in lost business, a tarnished brand, dysfunctional business processes, or failure to comply with laws and regulations. A good transaction experience enables organizations to quickly transform high-stakes transactions into immersive digital experiences, attract and retain more customers, sell more products and services, reduce abandonment rates and improve the quality of the information that flows into the organization’s business systems. &mdash; there are others
 * The article is closely linked to Avoka, but that seems not to be acknowledged in the text
 * You appear to have a conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your topic is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest


 * Not reasons for deletion, but if you recreate note the following
 * The lead section should have no heading
 * Headings should not include references or the article's name
 * in-line references should immediately follow punctuation
 * The topic title should be bolded at its first occurrence.

I have some reservations about recreating the text since some of it was copyright (and the editor who tagged for deletion also blanked the article for that reason. What I'm going to do is to post the article here and give you 24 hours to cut-and-paste it to an off-line editor. I'll then delete the sandbox if the unamended text is still there  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  05:59, 15 May 2013 (UTC)