User talk:Barkis419

Emanuel Goldberg
You can check the I've just made. Best, --ThT (talk) 14:36, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Buckland & Taylor Ltd


A tag has been placed on Buckland & Taylor Ltd, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Natureium (talk) 15:48, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

COI
You may have a conflict of interest, if so, you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:   . If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

Also read the following regarding writing an article
 * you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
 * The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:
 * significant coverage in
 * independent,
 * multiple,
 * reliable,
 * secondary sources.
 * Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.


 * you must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
 * there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
 * you must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above Jimfbleak - talk to me?  16:53, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your comments on my talk page. I'm prepared in principle to restore as a draft, but since the article lacked any independent sources as defined above, it will be a waste of your time unless you can find proper references. Are you able to do that? Also note that one danger of only using COI sources is that you get promo like noted not only for its bridge engineering of all types but also for its contributions to research and building code development... allowed Buckland & Taylor to compete on its position of strength: the design of durable, buildable, economical bridges... Notable Design Projects... Notable projects... first to be designed to modern North American earthquake standards... Innovative techniques... said to be the most intricate bridge ever constructed.... We require neutral text, not self-sourced or unsourced favourable opinions. Do you wish me to proceed to restore as a draft? Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  10:50, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure that you have answered my COI query, which you must do. Some of yours refs have bare urls, and the problematic durable, economical bridges with an emphasis on ease and speed of erection is still there. You can move the draft yourself or ask for a review using Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  06:04, 18 November 2019 (UTC)