User talk:Barnaby Tik

February 2023
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.  MrOllie (talk) 16:46, 13 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Why did you think it was inappropriate? I was adding more context about why psychographic is more useful. Currently I feel the passage fails to explain that. Barnaby Tik (talk) 16:58, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Marketing materials such as vendor blogs are never usable sources, see WP:RS. MrOllie (talk) 17:13, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
 * They are not intended to be marketing materials. I have added materials from different source materials and different websites. For example I also see you removed links I added to Michael Porters page, which included the companies own website and a interview conducted with their CMO. For my understanding, how is this unusable? I apologise if I broke any rules, it was not my intention. I was wanting to add value and contribute. Barnaby Tik (talk) 17:18, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
 * They're pretty obviously marketing materials (as were the ichom.org links you added). Are you associated with antlerzz in some way? MrOllie (talk) 18:01, 13 February 2023 (UTC)