User talk:Barnetbees91

January 2017
Hello, I'm Excirial. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Beggar My Neighbour (TV series)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 20:11, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Hello, I'm Class455. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of night buses in London have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Class 455 ( talk |stand clear of the doors!)  10:15, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2017–18 FA Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stamford Bridge ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/2017%E2%80%9318_FA_Cup check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/2017%E2%80%9318_FA_Cup?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Sources needed for Days of the Year pages
You're probably not aware but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide. The article about the person you added to February 9 did not have any source. I was able to track down a source and it turns out that you were wrong - which is exactly why we need sources. Please be sure that your additions include a direct reliable source. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 01:00, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at February 9. ''As I said above, you're adding that person to the wrong date. I mentioned that you needed to include a source too - which you have not done. Had you found a source, as you are required to, it would be obvious to everyone that you are inserting this incorrect information. Here is one you could use:  Please stop.'' Toddst1 (talk) 15:08, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Toddst1 (talk) 15:11, 9 February 2018 (UTC)