User talk:Barney83Stinson

Welcome!
Hello, Barney83Stinson, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Quick Reaction Team, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Emotionalllama (talk) 20:55, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Quick Reaction Team


A tag has been placed on Quick Reaction Team, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Emotionalllama (talk) 20:55, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Help me!
Please help me with creating an article for a YouTube Multi-channel networking company Whacked Out Media at IMDb, which is situated in Hyderabad under an organization named Mango Mass Media.

Following are few third party reference links: Renowned Sensation Festival Premiers in India Kajal Aggarwal Credits Whacked Out Media For Digital Presence YouTube MCN Whacked Out Media's Channels Soar! Hyd-based Whacked Out expands operations Top Youtube channel Telugu Filmnagar crosses 1.5 million subscriber mark

Barney83Stinson (talk) 09:09, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Please see the tutorial or your first article for advice on creating an article. Amortias (T)(C) 17:06, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Image Queries
Hi, I had a look at this image on the right you uploaded. May I know where did you obtain it from? --Lemongirl942 (talk) 09:39, 22 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Hello Lemongirl942, I am friends with actress Pallak Lalwani this is one of her personal images.

Conflict of Interest
Hello, Barney83Stinson. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Pallak Lalwani, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
 * instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 09:49, 22 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Lemongirl942, you can please check the COI with my relation with the article. As I've read WP:COI and criteria for article creation. I assure you that whatever I have written in the article has nothing to do with my personal relation with the actress, yet I leave it up to you and much experienced Wikipedia contributors for a wiser decision. Thanks for your time here on this page. Barney83Stinson (talk) 09:58, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Jayammu Nischayammu Raa 2016 Official Poster.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Jayammu Nischayammu Raa 2016 Official Poster.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:05, 22 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The source for the file this link has been added, thanks for notifying me. Barney83Stinson (talk) 10:10, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Pallak Lalwani Abbayitho Ammayi Actress.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Pallak Lalwani Abbayitho Ammayi Actress.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Majora (talk) 22:03, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Jayammu Nischayammu Raa 2016 Official Poster Launch.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jayammu Nischayammu Raa 2016 Official Poster Launch.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:19, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Raj Mohan


A tag has been placed on Raj Mohan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. OnionRing (talk) 11:19, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Pallak Lalwani for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pallak Lalwani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pallak Lalwani until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lemongirl942 (talk) 18:43, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Pallak Lalwani. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I  Talk to my owner :Online 10:26, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Taapsee Pannu Personal Photoshoot.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Taapsee Pannu Personal Photoshoot.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Taapsee Pannu Personal Photoshoot.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Taapsee Pannu Personal Photoshoot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:12, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Shirish Saravanan Rare-Pic.jpeg
Thank you for uploading File:Shirish Saravanan Rare-Pic.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:21, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shanmukha Films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mirchi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Pooja Jhaveri New Picture.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Pooja Jhaveri New Picture.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:05, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Please claim your upload(s): File:Pooja Jhaveri New Picture.jpeg
Hi, Thank you, for uploading this file.

However, as part of ongoing efforts to ensure all media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed it would be appreciated if you were able to confirm some details,

If it's your own work, please include own, amend the information added by a third party, and change the license to an appropriate "self" variant. You can also add  to the media by uploader tag if it is present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the information where appropriate).

If it's not your own work please provide as much sourcing/authorship information as you are able to.

This will assist those reviewing the many many "free" images on commons that have not yet been transfered to Commons.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:56, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Sanjjanaa Photoshoot Picture.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Sanjjanaa Photoshoot Picture.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -   Managerarc   ™ talk  15:40, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Pragya Jaiswal's Personal Photoshoot Pictures.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Pragya Jaiswal's Personal Photoshoot Pictures.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -   Managerarc   ™ talk  20:52, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Pragya Jaiswal, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. -   Managerarc   ™ talk  13:51, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Pragya Jaiswal Photoshoot Pics.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Pragya Jaiswal Photoshoot Pics.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -   Managerarc   ™ talk  22:19, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Pragya Jaiswal At Memu Saitham.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Pragya Jaiswal At Memu Saitham.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -   Managerarc   ™ talk  10:07, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pragya Jaiswal, you may be blocked from editing. STOP uploading copyrighted images and claiming them as your own work. -   Managerarc   ™ talk  10:09, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Questionable content
Hi, I don't consider this to be a very useful addition to Srimanthudu. Nowhere in our Manual of Style for film articles does it mention including the name of marketing companies hired to promote the film, and by itself it comes off as promotional of the promotion company, especially when considering your creation of the Whacked Out Media article. You have previously been apprised of our conflict of interest guidelines--I think it's fairly obvious you have a conflict. You are strongly discouraged from editing articles in which you might have a conflict of interest. Promotional companies attempting to pollute Wikipedia with their marketing nonsense is a persistent irritant and you'd be helping by not contributing more of that problem. So far I'm not sure you've demonstrated the notability of Whacked Out Media per our notability guidelines at WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. Using obvious press releases as references or Alexa rankings don't do anything to establish the subject's notability, and thus, its privilege to be at Wikipedia. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:36, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

- User:Cyphoidbomb, I understand Wikipedia guidelines, but I've listed all appropriate and reliable links to prove that this article is not related or relevant to any promotional activity of the given entity. I also agree that the given links might not be sufficient for the article to exist. But I hope that the given article does have enough citations to ensure its notability. Barney83Stinson (talk) 19:41, 10 August 2016 (UTC)


 * You should be aware also that if you are being paid to edit at Wikipedia (and the tonal style of Whacked Out Media is highly suggestive of this), you are required, as a matter of Wikipedia policy, to disclose that you are being paid, who is paying you, who the client is, and and any other relevant role or relationship. See WP:PAID. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:45, 10 August 2016 (UTC)


 * User:Cyphoidbomb I have dropped a request for creation of this given article a long time ago, and as it was not considered, I took it upto myself and I've created this article. I assure you that am not being paid nor being suggest to do so in any direct or indirect mean. Barney83Stinson (talk) 19:49, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:20, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

See, now I already had some serious doubts about your claims that you are unrelated to Whacked Out Media--you're obviously related to this organization in some way, but then you go and insult the community's intelligence by creating sockpuppet acccounts as if you think you can escape the community's scrutiny by using multiple accounts to promote these companies. This is not what Wikipedia is supposed to be used for. It's intellectually dishonest. When your block expires, you need to start making honest edits that improve the encyclopedia, or you should go find another hobby/business. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:24, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Category:Whacked Out Media has been nominated for discussion
Category:Whacked Out Media, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:16, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

User:Cyphoidbomb you have blocked my edits and expect me to answer your condescending questions for Category:Whacked Out Media. Please, either unblock and let me answer or stop vandalizing my edits/contributions Barney83Stinson (talk) 10:40, 23 August 2016 (UTC).


 * Hi Barney83Stinson. I would suggest you to read WP:PAID and WP:COI. On Wikipedia, we value transparency. So I would suggest that you disclose your connections to any PR agency/individual subjects. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:45, 23 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Lemongirl942. I am aware of WP:PAID and WP:COI and I am assuring you that I do not represent any PR Agency, nor have any connection with any one else. As I've seen so many requests and drafts on this subject. Request all admins to unblock my edits, as I have been making meaning full contributions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barney83Stinson (talk • contribs)


 * Whoa, whoa, you're upset about something? Condescending questions? Clearly I've hit a nerve. You remember why you're blocked, right? Nobody at Wikipedia would consider your abuse of multiple accounts to be meaningful contributions. Someone who goes through significant efforts to hide himself behind multiple accounts to perpetuate highly questionable and almost certainly promotional editing, while aggrandizing himself with unearned barnstars ain't exactly demonstrating superior ethical behavior. So you can chillax a little with the victimization bit. It's definitely best that the community figure out whether or not the category is useful, as other users' responses will help you to make better editing decisions in the future. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:16, 23 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Cyphoidbomb, time shall clear it off. check the other articles I've made, yes few were deleted. But the others are clean. Show me where I have cheated or vandalized community guidelines and I will learn from it and do better. I look up to community for right decision. Thank you! Ill wait for notification of unblock. Thank you. Barney83Stinson (talk) 08:38, 24 August 2016 (UTC)


 * One word: Sockpuppetry. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:24, 24 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Cyphoidbomb just coz you are showing some references doesn't mean you keep on tagging Sockpuppetry on my talks page. I am awaiting for any better and unbiased editor/admin to look into this matter and remove your untruthful tags. Barney83Stinson (talk) 06:45, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
 * "just coz you are showing some references"? What? What are you trying to say, exactly? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:48, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:09, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

For continuing your duplicitous, promotional editing as. I'm sure you don't like cheaters and liars, and neither do I. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:11, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WhackedOut-Logo-Full.png
 Thanks for uploading File:WhackedOut-Logo-Full.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:11, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Shanmukha Films Logo.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Shanmukha Films Logo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:35, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Shirish Saravanan Rare-Pic.jpeg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shirish Saravanan Rare-Pic.jpeg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 03:03, 1 October 2023 (UTC)