User talk:Barpaza

Most of the world and history does not agree with the fact that many sites and institutions in the USA especially, try to point the time of the Renaissance to the English (England). No person will deny that the English started making their own revolution, that was noticeably later thatn the Italian revolution, but also totally different. The Italian Renaissance and the High Renaissance are two moments in time that did not involve England in any aspect. What most people miss understand in our times while celebrating English Renaissance festivals, showing elegant men and women walking and talking with great manners. This is a fact that did not exist in England those days, and in fact their behavior was barbarian in some aspects still way into the 1400's. What they are trying to resemble, is the description of the elegance and beauty that Shakespeare narrates in his book. The book refers to the Italian society and it was developed thanks to a trip that the writer did to Italy. (even the characters are supposed to be italian) England had knights, kings and ladies, but they were not like the ones people portray in those famous festivals, that are held in the USA mostly. It is important that we give value and credit to the right cultures. Italian history has been almost abused of theft in many historical periods, by French and English. Unfortunately in the USA, the information we receive is not always the accurate one, and even in sites like this one that I consider one of the best ones, we have the problem of not giving the most accurate information. The term Renaissance means “rebirth” or “revival” England at that time had no revival. They were just stating to gain a sense of aesthetic and art like the one found it the main land Europe. This shows us that even the sole act of using this term makes no sense in this case. What England had, was a revolution in literature. That is something that no one can deny, but at the same time can not be related to the Renaissance, because writers like Shakespeare were not even acknowledged as good writers way after their death, which proves even more that such a revolution did not exist like some individuals say it did.