User talk:Barrettbaugh/sandbox

Natalie's Peer Review
Barrett, your additions so far seem to be great additions to the sections in which they were added to. I think that the additions you made to the Issues sections addressing the fragile watermarking method and the Qur'an Quote Algorithm added some insight into the section. I also think that you are doing a great job of integrating your source information with the already existing information. From what I can tell, your additions are orderly, and flow well logically, and they don’t duplicate any other existing information. Your additions fill in gaps in the existing article well and provide necessary information for the sections. I think that you could improve your article by adding a few direct quotes from the sources, this could add more information and explanation as to why the addition to this section is important. Also, I think that your additions could benefit from adding a few commas and some re-wording of a few of the sentences, like in the first sentence you added under Issues, you could put a comma before “but”. You could also either capitalize or italicize “fragile watermarking method” in the next sentence to make it stand out. From what I can tell, your sources are good so far, as they seem to be reliable and provide the necessary information for your edits. Overall, the preliminary grade I would give you, according to the rubric, would be an A. NatalieR97 (talk) 18:46, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Jaclyn-Michael (talk) 18:26, 8 April 2019 (UTC)== JM's Peer Review ==

Two comments on what your individual changes do well:

Discusses the issue of watermarking

Discusses the issue of diacritics when displaying the Qur'an digitally

Two comments on what needs improvement:

Revise the header "Advancements / Recitation" to be more precise. First, "advancements" is vague. Advancements in what or to what? Also, it seems to be a different topic from "recitation."

Why have you added a section on recitation (besides at my suggestion)? It isn't clear to an uninformed reader why a section on recitation would be necessary. Spell it out in plain language. Develop this section further with discussion of how learning to recite the Qur'an takes place in digital spaces, and what issues may arise in that endeavor. "The digital versions of the Qur'an have also developed in of themselves" does not make sense. Revise.

Your total edits amount to the minimum for expected contributions to the overall page changes. Expand upon the sections you have been working on if you would like an improved grade.

Preliminary grade: C — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaclyn-michael (talk • contribs) 18:23, 8 April 2019 (UTC)