User talk:Barrmann

October 2017
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Misoprostol, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. — Paleo Neonate  – 21:14, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Medical abortion, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. — Paleo Neonate  – 21:14, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Previous username
Having looked at your multiple and massive removal of content so far, it is obvious that you are not a new user, so I don't have to beat around the bush. You know very well that removal of sourced material is going to need more justification than your opinion expressed in an edit summary. Edits like this are clearly not acceptable, and you're perfectly aware that the way to fix what you feel is over-long quotation is to either flag it with Template:Long quote or paraphrase the source yourself. Simply removing sourced text with no better justification than your own take on "fair use" is not going to be tolerated. Now, please let us know the username you previously edited as, so that we know whom we're dealing with. --RexxS (talk) 21:36, 30 October 2017 (UTC)