User talk:BarryGrant81

A tag has been placed on Creo Mundi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bagheera (talk) 17:57, 11 January 2008 (UTC)


 * this article is deletable for all sorts of reasons
 * It's pure spam - It starts with the company website, and unsourced puffs like Creo Mundi is a positive way of being and promotional stuff like The Creo Mundi concept is about a positive way of being ― it is about consciously choosing to be positive, to be surrounded by positive energy. It is about making the choice to be hopeful, be peaceful, be loving, be a mentor and so on.
 * It is completely unsourced - articles need independent verifiable sources
 * Because their are no references, it does not show that that it meets the notability guidelines for companies.
 * As an advertisement, it clearly does not meet the requirements for a neutral point of view
 * It is not written in an encyclopaedic style
 * Even without looking at Eastman Kodak's article, I'd be surprised if it doesn't meet all the above criteria. Jimfbleak (talk) 19:42, 11 January 2008 (UTC)