User talk:Barry White

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please read articles before commenting on them. See the second paragraph of vestigial structure, for example, which completely invalidates the point you made on the corresponding Talk page. -- Ec5618 10:54, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

keep up the good work
I removed 150 years from Hunza people as there was no literary text for that. Otherwise it was a good attempt. Please keep up the good work. And here is the welcome note for you, since i noticed no one welcomed you here. nids 18:55, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Your comments in Evolution
the point is that cannot be used as evidence casue it is a lie those flaps of skin in the human embroy become the ear canals glands, ur ears and simply are not gills if you want to say that they have gills. If you have other evidence that hasn't been proven wrong for embryology then you can use it but the gill statement that has been use as past evidence has been proven wrong.
 * I moved your comment to your userpage as it was both offensive and pointless. If you want to contribute do it politly and with reason.--Roland Deschain 01:41, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Suggestion: use coherent sentences. People will be more likely to listen to you when they can easily understand what you have writtenJoshuaZ 01:52, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

What is wrong? All I said is that if you have info that wasn't proven wrong he could use it. I was just explaing that human embroyos don't have gill silts.

evidence

http://www.ridgecrest.ca.us/~do_while/sage/v2i1e.htm Read the part about the "The Biogenetic Law" saying that human don't have resperoray organs in those pharyngeal pouches that become glands in the neck and the ear canal.
 * I will have no problem if you rewrite your comment as you have done on my talk page (and yours). It is polite and offers some kind of reasoning.  The concept of ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny has long been discarded by scientists as a good indicator of homology.  The fact that you still harp on it is very disconcerning.  What the post was about was not the 1800s embryology about humans with gills, but rather the 21st century evolutionary developmental biology that investigates the genetic mechanism for large scale evolution (which is nicely observed in embryos).  Keep up with the times ;).--Roland Deschain 02:27, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Evolution and Entropy
I'm not a physicist, so I cannot give you a good answer for your questions. However, here are a couple of good links. Your concern is addressed in the Evolution page here. More information on self-organization can be found here.--Roland Deschain 04:31, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Signing
As a courtesy to other editors, it is a Wikipedia guideline to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, and WikiProject pages. To do so, simply add four tildes ( ~ ) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then be automatically added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). For further info, read Talk page guidelines. Thank you.  •  Maurog   •  15:26, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Kashrut
Your questions on Talk:Kashrut suggest that you seem to be treating Wikipedia as a forum. If you have specific questions, could you use the reference desk rather than leaving random questions on article talkpages? JFW | T@lk  16:49, 3 September 2007 (UTC)