User talk:Barticus88

This is Randall Bart's talk page. Most of my edits are for The Great Disambiguation Project , so you may want to check out my Disambiguation FAQ

Welcome
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;. Four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -Fsotrain09 01:02, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

Feral in Mexico & US
I cannot find information about feral peafowl in Mexico in the 19th century and their dispersion throughout Mexico and prolifereation from there to much of the USA, from California to Florida, in the 20th century. Please, do you know anything about it? I need exact references. --Michael Romanov 06:17, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Signature
If you like this signature, you can use it by :


 * 1) Clicking "my preferences".
 * 2) On the Signature field, activate the "Raw signature" button and insert the code for your signature.
 * 3) Click "Save preferences".
 * 4) Test it.

Here is the signature:  Barticus  88  

Like it?  •S  e  an•gorter•  (T) (P) 11:17, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to WikiProject Northern Ireland
Thank you for your help. In my haste in setting up the Troubles project page on Saturday, I missed the disambiguation. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 10:44, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Invitation to WikiProject_Telecommunications
You have made many good contributions in the area of telecommunications. Why not join the WikiProject Telecommunications? Mange01 00:28, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Hold on with the "military junta" dabs!
I noticed that you'd changed junta to "military junta" on the Sandinista National Liberation Front page, and I see you're changing it on a lot of pages. First, "military junta" just redirects to "military dictatorship." Second, I don't think you should be killing wikilinks to "junta" just because it's a disambig page, as it does contain information about juntas in general, that some might find useful. Third, in the FSLN case, it was not a military junta. Anyway, hold up with the junta-killing! -- Groggy Dice   T|C 09:19, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

RFD
On 09 January, you tagged the Native Americans: America's Palestinians redirect for deletion, but you did not complete the nomination by listing it at WP:RFD. While I have fixed this one, please see the instructions at WP:RFD for future reference. You may also wish to comment on the deletion debate at that page. -- JLaTondre 20:04, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 * See Redirects for discussion/Log/2007 January 27 — Randall Bart 09:29, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Goth links
Thank you so much for putting in the hard yards disambiguating so many links to "Goth". I've been trying to do a bunch each day to try to get it under control, but your efforts have far outshone mine. :-) --Stormie 03:16, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Perfect numbers
I saw your new Template:Divisor_classes and thought it looked pretty cool. Nice work!

CRGreathouse (t | c) 18:58, 11 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanx. I was on one of those pages (mondo abundant, I think), and clicked one of the "see also" links, and there I noticed the see also list included other links, and before I knew it I had over a dozen see also lists to merge, so I decided to make a box.  Then I spent a few hours making a box, including one catastrophic failure and a long lesson on Do Not Fight The Tool. But I ended up with pretty much what I wanted, a narrow right side box with white on green title.


 * I screwed up and put an underscore everywhere I used it, but that doesn't matter, so I didn't fix it. Don't tell anyone I invented the term "divisor classes".  If some mathematician wants to correct me, they can tell me what the correct term is for that list of things I made, and I'll go fix it.  As I decided how to order the list, I realized I needed prime and composite.  I have three more to add: unit, void, and power.  There are articles on 1, 0, and exponentiation, but not on those number theory concepts.  Power I can do without, but you really can't have composite and prime without unit and void.  Well there are integer fields without units (a+b&radic;5, IIRC), but if you don't have units you don't have primes, only composites. — Randall Bart 04:04, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Malays dab page
Would you be willing to give a little feedback on the possibility of redirecting the Malays dab page to Malay per my comment at Talk:Malays? Dekimasu が... 12:54, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Glad to be of service. — Randall Bart 17:53, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Talk:Chinese, relating to a possible redirect of Chinese people to Chinese, is another case that could use a new outside opinion (in either direction), if you have the time. Dekimasu よ! 03:01, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Lewis with Harris
Is there much point in having the category on this page as well as the page it redirects to, it looks strange when you look at the list under the category itself. Fraslet 20:51, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I was just getting to that. First I add to Category:Amalgamated placenames, then  I take away.  I knew there would be duplicates (Waldeck-Pyrmont and Waldeck and Pyrmont eg).— Randall Bart 21:03, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Cunning. Good luck! Fraslet 21:05, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Well said about divisiveness!
Just came here to give you kudos. DanielZimmerman 02:38, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Huh?
What do you mean I deleted the template? It's still there. I would have no objection to userfying it per WP:GUS, of course.  &gt; R a d i a n t &lt;  09:12, 2 March 2007 (UTC)


 * If you didn't delete the template, who did this?— Randall Bart 13:25, 2 March 2007 (UTC)


 * That's not the template we were talking about. At any rate, as clearly stated in the deletion summary, this is a recreation, which falls under WP:CSD criterion G4.  &gt; R a d i a n t &lt;  13:41, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Palatinate
Hi, you seem to plan to move Palatinate to Palatinate (disambiguation). Just to let you know, there has been a survey in January, which resulted in the move in the opposite direction, see Talk:Electoral Palatinate. Markussep 20:21, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually I plan to leave Palatinate (disambiguation) pointing at Palatinate. The long link is used to tell disambiguators the link doesn't need to be fixed.
 * OK. Markussep 20:37, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Malformed TfD nominations
On February 26th, you made a couple TfD nominations here: Templates for deletion/Log/2007_February_26 in which you simply named the template. In the future, please use  because it makes it easy to see if the template has been deleted and what still links to it. &mdash;dgies tc 16:42, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I thought I had followed procedure. I'll try, but the xfD procedures are non-intuitive and differ from each other.  The xfD procedures are all in need of revision.  Maybe I should work on that project. — Randall Bart 16:50, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Wait, here I am giving you bad advice: the actual instructions are, which is very similar to lt.  Still, a homogenization of XfD procedures might be good... &mdash;dgies tc 16:57, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Latin
Hey, how's it going? I'd just use Delenda delenda est. Of course, literally I guess this would be rendered "destruction (destroying) is being destroyed", but the sense of "Destruction must be destroyed" will be conveyed. I'm taking a little bit of a liberty by using delenda twice as a gerundive, but the "est" clarifies the use of the second gerundive. Hope this helps! PS -- if you have other questions, feel free to drop a line. &#0149;Jim 62 sch&#0149; 11:23, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanx, but I want to avoid "taking a little bit of liberty". I'm sure Delenda delenda est will be good enough, but I'll put a little effort into finding if something is better. — Randall Bart 07:56, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

TfD of Template:User_Kim_Possible
For future reference, if there is a page you want to delete which has only been edited by yourself, you can tag it for speedy deletion under WP:CSD: "Author requests deletion. Any page for which deletion is requested by the original author in good faith, provided the page's only substantial content was added by its author." To do so, add db-author to the page. I have already tagged the page for you, referencing your request to delete. Obviously if it is a page in wide use speedy deletion would not be advisable. &mdash;dgies tc 20:50, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay, dewd. I'm just trying to get along.  — Randall Bart 20:56, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem, I'm just trying to save you future effort. &mdash;dgies tc 21:07, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Reversion on Rouge Admin Page
Hey the tags were a joke. The page is a humorous one. You could have at least used the talk page before undoing somebody's work. Seriously. I won't bother reverting it back, but I hope you will reconsider and change it back yourself. It's HUMOR. Sue Rangell 01:05, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I think the red link user did a revert before he got the joke, then reverted himself once he grokked the page. I then did a third revert, which under the circumstances is not climbing the Reichstag, but could be construed as loitering in der Platz der Republik in unusual attire.
 * The joke didn't seem to fit. It's the wrong type of joke for that page.  There's a clause and sentence level believability of the piece that was being violated.   — Randall Bart 03:37, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Chinese checkers
Saw you added "Swedish checkers" as an alternate name. Googling shows only 13 results, so I don't think this is an often used name, if at all, so I deleted it. A source would probably be needed for such an obscure version of the name.

Not that "Chinese" checkers is any more correct, of course, but it seems that nobody cares about that (ironically Chinese people seem to have appropriated the name and claimed the game for ourselves). Kelvinc 22:45, 16 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I have never read a description of Chinese checkers in a book which didn't say it was originally called Swedish checkers. I must have read it at least ten times (probably two books five times each).  I have seen Swedish checkers sets.  Of course this may be manufactured history.  The claim that it's German not Swedish is news to me.
 * Web searching was not fruitful. I found a few people mentioning there is such a game, but no description to what it is.  Certainly not a cite.  My books may be out of storage soon, but I may not even have the book.  Until I find something, there's nothing.— Randall Bart 23:13, 16 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for being cool with it. I suppose adding it with fact appended might work: your call.  Maybe I'll go to the library in the upcoming days and browse through the books on board games to see if I can help.  Kelvinc 01:44, 17 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I looked at all the trans-wiki links, and didn't see anything that looked like "Svensk" on any of them. (No that I would recognize it in Chinese, but I looked anyway.)  Now I am seriously wondering about the provenance of the name "Swedish Checkers".  If I can find a Swedish Checkers set, I will be sure to upload a picture. — Randall Bart 21:51, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Posthumous
Hi, I noticed your post on WP:DPL about disambiguating posthumous. Have you run into many instances of that article being linked when someone is talking about an album released after a band's breakup and not necessarily after someone's death? I found that the other day and I'm not sure that's a proper use of the term. --Mus Musculus 19:49, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Not correct, but probably figurative. In quotes, it's okay.  Hmmm. I mean that two different ways.  In a quotation ("We released it posthumously"), or in scare quotes (on their "posthumous" Foo album).  However, I would use scare quotes in Wikipedia text only if that word is used in a cite.  In such a case the scare quotes indicate that Wikipedia doesn't really endorse that meaning.
 * As for linking it (if you keep it), I don't expect [[figuratively posthumous works]] will be written any time soon. You could link to [[posthumous works]], but I would delink. — Randall Bart 21:18, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Could you look at something for me?
I don't want to sway you in one direction or the other on this topic, but could I get you to look at this, then give me your honest opinion?

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sue Rangell/B.R.I.T.T.A.N.I.C.A.

Sue Rangell &#91; citation needed &#93; 18:24, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

RFD for Veterans with Desputed Status
I have formatted the deletion discussion per WP:RFD and am informing you per your request. I have left the text of your comment unchanged, so you may want to update it here. Cheers, Black Falcon 20:30, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

WhatLinksHere
Hi Randall, I just wanted to thank you for your work on the WhatLinksHere script. I find it really useful and, in fact, I've been toying around with it for a few hours now. If you don't mind, I'd also like to bother you with a Javascript-related question. (Disclaimer: I'm a Unix guy. So when I hear script, I think bash. I've written more than a few lines of C (and, reluctantly, C++) code in my day but I'm certainly no JS expert. In other words, there's a good chance I'm overlooking something really obvious. Oh well, the only thing I've got to loose is my special geek parking permit).

Basically, what I'm trying to do is display a working DPL div on the article page (ie. without clicking the 'what links here' link). The problem is, that I don't know how to load the 'wlh' page into memory (on-the-fly) without actually loading it in a visible tab or window. The only simple solution I can think of right now is to have a servlet/cgi script on one of my servers do the legwork (ie. parsing) but that seems a bit excessive and pretty inefficient. Is there any other way you can think of to do what I'm trying to do? Cheers. -- Seed 2.0 22:52, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

P.S. A quick heads up: the template you use on your userpage appears to have been moved recently.


 * I started doing JavaScript on December 30, so I don't know everything yet. I'm not sure what your question is.  If you look at the way I use my getGetParamValue function, does that help?  Otherwise, go ask at Wikipedia Talk:WikiProject User scripts.


 * Hey, thanks for your answer. Frankly, it doesn't really since I'm trying to parse a page on-the-fly that the user hasn't looked at. What I'm trying to do is this: 1.) The user loads the article. 2.) The script grabs the 'what links here' page in the background without the user noticing and (from here on, it's a piece of cake). 3.) The script adds the div at the top or bottom of the article.


 * Right now, I'm not sure if this is even possible. I suppose it could be done using a server-side script but right now I'm too busy/lazy (interesting combination, btw ;) to bother since the 'what links here' page is just a click away. Thanks though. I'll see if I can come up with a way to fix this tomorrow and, failing that, I'll take it to the project's talkpage. Cheers, -- Seed 2.0 01:06, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Wu who reaction
See [].And I dont see any other reason for deletion of this article,by the way. New Babylon 16:21, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't understand. I disambiguated Wu, and wrote the words "Wu who", but that related to a physicist, and the link you gave me is about dynasties. What was deleted? — Randall Bart (talk) 16:29, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:KimPossible.png
Hello, Barticus88. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:KimPossible.png) was found at the following location: User:Barticus88. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or    media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 16:38, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:KimPossible.png
Hello Barticus88, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:KimPossible.png) was found at the following location: User:Barticus88. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 13:00, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Hipparchos (astronomer)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Hipparchos (astronomer), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Hipparchos (astronomer) fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: '''Hipparchos is already redirected to Hipparchus. Nobody is going to search for "hipparchos astronomer", and if they do, they will find the proper page anyway. No other pages link here.''' To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Hipparchos (astronomer), please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Hipparchos (astronomer) itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 14:52, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

"Anna Mae He"
See my discussion page for an important reply to your question. JodyByak, yak, yak 13:19, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

right-of-way -> easement dabs
I see that you've been switching links from right-of-way to easement, but that is not always a semantic replacement. In particular, it is common (probably even typical) for public roadbuilding in the US to involve actual ownership of the property rather than an easement. For example, in Texas state highways, a sentence used to read:


 * After the city or county acquires right-of-way, TXDOT builds and maintains the road.

This sentence is wrong after the replacement has occurred. The local government is not acquiring mere easement to travel: it purchases, is given, or has to condemn the property. The fact that, after the road is built, the public has an implied easement to travel across it (as described in the easement talk page is irrelevant), since that's not what the sentence describes. It is using the term 'right-of-way' to mean the boundaries of the acquired property. This usage is common in the US. Deh 13:45, 30 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I've been struggling with some uses of "right-of-way" to mean "route", but this is not one of them. There were some cases where the easement sense was completely lost, so I didn't change Triborough Bridge or Simutrans Transport Simulator.  I stand behind "easement" in the case you mention, because intent of the the city or county is to buy an easement, though usually by acquiring 100% interest in the property.
 * But as I said, I have been struggling with some of these, so let's continue this at Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation pages with links. — Randall Bart (talk) 18:39, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Smile


has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
 * Thanks for making me laugh with your funny edit summary to the Lifest article! Royal broil



has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Hey thanks for fixing the capitalization of the article for my open source project.

OMG LOL Thank you!
Thank you for making me laugh. I don't know why it was so funny, but it made me laugh out loud when I saw your edit summary on one of my watchlist pages. here LOLOLOL! - Jeeny Talk 03:22, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar
TYVM — Randall Bart (talk) 03:35, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Judd Winick
Hi. There is a discussion about the Judd Winick article's length. Would you mind weighing in with your opinion on its Talk Page? Thanks. Nightscream 07:13, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Incorrect warning — sorry
I just put a warning on this page that was not for you — clicked the wrong line in the history page. Sorry about that. Schutz 08:10, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
 * np— Randall Bart (talk) 08:12, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

"...in the holy name of..."
Too funny! Cheers, --Fire Star 火星 04:21, 13 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I second that, coming from this diff.

IvoShandor 22:27, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * what the hell are pop-ups??? Seems humorous, but I you have gone through multiple articles making this edit, and I still can't figure out what the pop-up is? please explain so I am not blaspheming wikipedia ;-) --Abebenjoe 23:39, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Just click on the word "Popups" in the edit summary. — Randall Bart (talk) 23:47, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * LOL thanks for the laugh Jeepday (talk) 13:08, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

stop changing marching band
Please justify yourself on the marching band talk page. I am once again reverting your edit. Marching bands often use a ceremonial mace, BUT NOT ALWAYS!!! Most military bands use a functional mace that can be used as a weapon and do not fit the definition in the lede of the ceremonial mace page. — BQZip01 — talk 07:46, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Cobblestone School
Thank you for catching the ambiguous wikilink for portfolio in the Cobblestone School article. I have linked it to the correct Career portfolio page. Thanks again. Truthanado 23:53, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * TY. Ironically, portfolio is a case where I had ambivalence, and ended up leaving many unchanged.  Had I hit this one later I might have linked to Career portfolio or not changed it, but at the time I hit it I decided to delink.  Partly, I was reading Career portfolio too narrowly, and several more could have been linked there.— Randall Bart (talk) 00:00, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Holy name of wiki!
Doing a great little jobb there! --Amandajm 07:29, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, but please take care. This dab is incorrect. The article uses "ordinance" in the sense of "national government decree", not "local ordinance". Sandstein 20:12, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * You're right; decree is better. When there's a compound construction (A and B), I try to slice the topic to avoid the articles already linked.  In this case the article to avoid was law, so I should have hit decree.  I'm virtually positive the law applies at the federal, cantonal, and local level, so I figured it wasn't wrong for slicing the topic, but somewhat surprising in the context of the words linked. — Randall Bart (talk) 22:25, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Ordinance
I'm not sure why you removed the link to the disambiguation page for ordinance from High Court of Justice for the trial of Charles I, however, I have added an alternative link which you may like to look at. Rjm at sleepers 06:52, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I delinked it because 1) it's meaning was made clear in context (so linking to "law" would just be silly), and 2) I didn't seriously think I would find an article on "ordinance" in the context of Parliament of the Interregnum. Of course it wasn't clear to you that I was on a disambiguation run, because the message in Popups for link removal is not customizable.  If I had changed the link the message would have mentioned the great disambiguation project.
 * BTW, I recently ranted about why I do so many delinks. Let me assure you I respect that article.  — Randall Bart (talk) 09:35, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Ordinance / Decree
You recently changed the link from ordinance to decree in the article Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee. But in the Indian legal context, ordinance is the term for a law passed by the government while the parliament is not in session. So I believe the former link should be retained on the article, with possibly an addition of this meaning of ordinance to the disambiguation page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mkeranat (talk • contribs) 20:57, August 27, 2007 (UTC)


 * As stated on the project page, "Ideally, Wikipedia articles should not link to disambiguation pages (with rare exceptions where the ambiguity of a term is being discussed)". I'm trying to pipe that link to an appropriate article.  If there's an article on "ordinance" as used by the Government of India, that would be ideal.  Short of that, it was [[law]] or [[decree]], and "decree" seemed to fit more. I am just a Wikignome with no lasting interest in that page.  You can direct it as you wish, but if you direct it to the disambiguation page, in a few months another disambiguator will change it. — Randall Bart (talk) 00:07, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Your puzzler
Answering here, so as not to blurt it out on WT:DPL, so others can also have the fun. Take the x's and z's out of xzwzxoxxozzlzxwxzoxzrxztxxhzzsxz to see the answer. Thanks for the challenge, one I was not quite up to without a bit of wikidigging. Happy editing! Chris the speller 20:18, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
 * You really are the speller, aren't you. —  Randall Bart     Talk   04:15, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

A. K. Faezul Huq
Hey, thanks for the changes you made on my father's page. Appreciate it. The Minister 11:47, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Panavision edits
Hey, I just wanted to give you a heads up that I've reverted your edits. While the credit is interesting, it's debatable how relevant it is to the overall topic (it is somewhat trivial), and additionally, the current consensus on IMDb is that is that it's not a reliable source for referencing. Please let me know if you have any further concerns. Thanks, Girolamo Savonarola 22:26, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Whatever. —  Randall Bart     Talk   00:36, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Public libraries in other federal government countries
You changed the link to federal in this article to the US federal govt, when the article specifically includes discussion of at least two other countries that have federal govts. Are you sure that the term federal in that article should be limited to the US? just checking before I revert. thanks --Tinned Elk 22:27, 24 September 2007 (UTC)


 * I took "county, state, federal" as such an obvious USA-centric expression, I just went with the flow. I just changed it to central government; you may change it to anything you wish.  For more info, see my Dab FAQ.   Randall Bart    Talk   00:50, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Gothic
Hi, Gothic can also refer to the Gothic alphabet, not just sans-serif. Cheers, --Kjoonlee 13:56, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Was there a specific case you would like to point out? Gothic alphabet would only apply to the era about 400 to 800 AD, while sans serif and blackletter are more modern, so I can't imagine an article where it would be ambiguous.  Randall Bart    Talk   00:01, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi, Fixedsys Excelsior is a sans-serif font, so all letter shapes are "Gothic." It also has letters from the Gothic alphabet, which is completely distinct from the Latin alphabet. Cheers, --Kjoonlee 05:33, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I did not expect to see Gothic alphabet in that context. When I'm on a dab run, most of the articles I don't read deeply. Good catch.   Randall Bart    Talk   08:31, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Bot edit error (I think)
I believe that your disambiguation bot put an erroneous link into the Archie Griffin page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Archie_Griffin&diff=159270510&oldid=157757836

This link looks bogus:

junior university)

as it only has the closing ')'. Maybe it should be "junior (university)" ?

RainbowCrane | Talk 12:13, 30 September 2007 (UTC)


 * I am not a bot
 * Yeah, I bobbled that one. I was very frustrated disambiguating [[junior]], because there is an article called [[high school junior]], but no college equivalent.  Further, I had no precedent to follow, because "freshman", "sophomore", and "senior" were all handled differently.  I ended punting by creating redlinks to [[junior (university)]].  I'm not sure exactly how I fat fingered this one, but since it was intended as a redlink, I didn't catch the error.    Randall Bart    Talk   20:39, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Looking more closely at that one it is especially puzzling. That was one with both high school and college, so I had to edit manually.  The summary generated by Popups has Junior (university), which means Popups created the edit changing all three to [[junior (university)]], and I needed to manually change one to [[high school junior]].  How I fat fingered the one I didn't need to change is a mystery.
 * Now that I look even more, more closely, I see that Popups changed two links to [[junior (university)]], I then changed one of those to [[high school junior]], and along the way I decided to add one more link, and botched it. Fixed now. Thanx.   Randall Bart    Talk   20:54, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Metalstorm Ranger disambiguation
In keeping with the proper meaning of the main character's title of "Ranger", he is supposed to be space cop... a protector, a guardian, and in this case in which it is being used in the movie, the best link for it is still, AND WILL FOREVER BE, "Ranger". He wasn't a commando, and definitely not a freakin D&D character class! I laughed at that! Come on... please use some common sense - Did you even watch this movie? If not then you should know he was more or less a bounty hunter than anything, but they called him a "ranger" for some reason. Please stop changing the link. Cyberia23 22:35, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 * When disagreeing about an edit I have made, please provide a link to the article.
 * Wow, what an odd case. I went at ranger in multiple phases over a week, searching for articles to link to.  I reread the lede to [[Ranger (character class)]], and took it for a generic crap fiction article, so I took a bunch of crap fiction articles still in need of disambiguation, and sent them there.
 * If it's worth linking, [[commando]] is correct, though not that good. Perhaps you would like to write an article called [[Ranger (crap fiction)]]. See also my FAQ Randall Bart    Talk   23:04, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of British and United States military ranks compared
An article that you have been involved in editing, British and United States military ranks compared, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you. Caerwine Caer’s whines 22:06, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

WP:WLA
(♠ Taifar ious1 ♠) 02:00, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

I broke the template, because it was putting this page in the project category.  Randall Bart    Talk   21:17, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

whatlinkshere.js just stopped working
I don't know why, since you didn't change it and I haven't changed my own monobook.js file, but it stopped working sometime yesterday. Maybe there's been some change in the format of Whatlinkshere pages? --Russ (talk) 14:52, 13 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Found the problem. Some genius in the dev group changed the page title from Special:Whatlinkshere to Special:WhatLinksHere.  If I'd only monitored each and every one of hundreds of items in the MediaWiki Bugzilla on a daily basis, of course, I'd already have known about this.  --Russ (talk) 14:59, 13 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Fixed. Thanx for the headsup, and thanx again for chasing down what changed.   Randall Bart    Talk   21:15, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Wookie Rules
That isn't relevant if someone considers the wookie a gnat. - Arcayne   (cast a spell)  21:41, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Manson's name
On the Charles Manson talk page, I've provided information in response to your question about Manson's name.JohnBonaccorsi (talk) 04:53, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Army Air Corps
As the person who moved Army Air Corps to Army Air Corps (United Kingdom) (via another move), and who converted Army Air Corps to a DAB page, I'd like to thank you for cleaning up all the links you've been working on. I didn't realize there were so many, or that not all of them were related to the UK AAC. Thanks for your diligence in this. - BillCJ (talk) 21:07, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Bug in WhatLinksHere.js
The "5000" tab doesn't work correctly any more, at least not all the time. I think the problem is the url500 regex -- the link that this parses sometimes contains " &amp;amp; hidetrans=1" in it, and the &amp;amp; needs to be converted back into a simple & character. --Russ (talk) 21:21, 19 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I've had some difficulty with it as well. The number 5000 was the max the software is configured to allow, but I may need to reduce that becasue I keep getting timeouts.  I'll look at it.   Randall Bart    Talk   16:50, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia Loves Art
First off, I apologize for the spam. You are receiving this message because you have indicated that you are in Southern California or interested in Southern California topics (either via category or WikiProject).

I would like to invite you to the Los Angeles edition of Wikipedia Loves Art, a photography scavenger hunt to be held at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA) on Saturday, February 28, 2009, from 1:00 to 7:00 PM. All photos are intended for use in Wikipedia articles or on Wikimedia Commons. There will be a prize available for the person who gets the most photos on the list.

If you don't like art, why not come just to meet your fellow Wikipedians. Apparently, we haven't had a meetup in this area since June 2006!

If you are interested in attending, please add your name to Wikipedia Loves Art. Please make a note if you are traveling to the area (train or plane) and need transportation, which can probably be arranged via carpool, but we need time to coordinate. Lodging is as of right now out of scope, but we could discuss that if enough people are interested.

Thank you and I hope to see you there!  howcheng  {chat} 23:33, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron


I noticed that you are part of Category:Wikipedians against notability.

I would like to invite you to join the Article Rescue Squadron. Although Rescue Squadron members do not share any official position on notability, and are simply focused on rescuing articles for deletion, you may find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia.

Caveat: I am writing this as a wikipedian, not as a representative of Article Rescue Squadron. Ikip (talk) 19:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to ARS!
{| style="border: 2px solid #CC3333; padding: 6px; width: 80%; min-width: 700px; background: lightsteelblue; line-height: 20px; cellpading=30" align=center Hi,, welcome to the Article Rescue Squadron WikiProject! We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying and rescuing articles and content that have been nominated for deletion. Every day hundreds of articles are deleted, many rightfully so. But many concern notable subjects and are poorly written, ergo fixable, and should not be deleted. We try to help these articles and content to quickly improve and address the concerns of why they are proposed for deletion. This covers a lot of ground and your help is appreciated!
 * colspan="2" |

Recent death
Please see this discussion which is related to a proposed change to Recent death. An example of how this change would appear is on this userpage. --Brian McNeil /talk 00:21, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Lviv area
This area was a part of Kingdom of Poland, that in turn belonged to the Commonwealth, and went to Austria already in the First Partition of Poland. Rembecki (talk) 08:23, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Barticus88! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:54, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Paul Paquet -

Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter
Content


 * News items and announcements
 * Contest


 * Featured editor: Teeninvestor
 * Featured administrator: WereSpielChequers


 * Want ads
 * Feature: FeydHuxtable: Search Techniques

Homer Defined
Hello. I noticed this edit, and I was wondering if you could be more specific. Thanks, Scorpion 0422  00:06, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * It seemed a lot of things showed up twice in that article, such as Redd Foxx. Delete the tag if you think you have removed the needless repetition.   Randall Bart    Talk   00:59, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, the Red Foxx repition was a mistake. I copied the text from its original section (production) to a new section (cultural references), but forgot to delete the original text. -- Scorpion 0422  01:39, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Divisor classes
Template:Divisor classes has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:48, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Polish places
Hi, good to see your tidying up some of the placename/road articles, but as regards what you did with Dąbie, I'd just like to point out: (a) we generally treat towns as primary topics over villages, so the town called Dąbie could happily have stayed with that title, unless you think there's some village or other place of particular significance; (b) if a name redirects to the disambiguation page, then the disambiguation page should simply have that name (so if Dąbie redirects to Dąbie (diambiguation), then the dab page should simply be renamed Dąbie); (c) if you do decide to demote something from primary topic, you will break a lot of existing links (all those articles that linked to the town Dąbie now have those links broken, unless you go around repairing them. So all in all, I think it would be better not to do renamings of this type, but if you do do them, make sure you repair all the links, and name the dab page appropriately.--Kotniski (talk) 08:06, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * For now, I've redirected Dąbie back to the town, so the existing links still work.--Kotniski (talk) 08:15, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Sometimes, I am guessing at how significant a town is. Dąbie, Greater Poland Voivodeship has a population of 2,087.  Dąbie, Łuków County has a population of 900.  Dąbie, Subcarpathian Voivodeship has a population of 980.  Dąbie, Silesian Voivodeship has a population of 524.  Dąbie, Lubusz Voivodeship has a population of 417.  From that I would guess that Dąbie, Greater Poland does not rate standing in front of the disambiguation page.  Perhaps history (including WWII) magnifies this Dąbie so it truly overshadows the others.  You might know that better than I.
 * I thought about fixing Dąbie links. Those links that formerly were correctly pointing at the article are now another click away.  However, links that were wrong, are now one click from the right page.  Now that I look at these links, I see most of them are historical, and some modern ones point to the old place, but I found at least one that's wrong.  Przystanek Woodstock should point to Dąbie, Szczecin, right?  It's the presence of confusing ones like that, that leads me to leave some links for others to fix.
 * There is nothing wrong with Dąbie pointing to Dąbie (disambiguation). I've worked disambiguation for years, and I know they should go the other way, but there has never been any rule to fix them once they get backwards, and they often do.
 * Tomorrow, I will point it back at the dab page, and fix the links. If you still don't like it, you can move it back.  I do a disambiguation project, then I move on.    Randall Bart    Talk   09:01, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I just checked, and the article I was working on that led me to Dąbie, was a link that should have gone to Dąbie, Lubusz.   Randall Bart    Talk   09:10, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I have re-redirected Dąbie (and Dabie) to Dąbie (disambiguation). I fixed all the incoming links except I am still working on Voivodeship road and I am sufficiently unsure of Polish–Ukrainian War, that I tagged it dn.  I also put a dn tag after Babiak in Chelmno extermination camp.  I could guess that both of these are Greater Poland, but those two are subject matter where I avoid guesswork.  I found five of the links were wrong, and there may be more in the Voivodeship road article.     Randall Bart    Talk   01:21, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Right, good work! I can't help with the remaining two disambiguations - I guess the Dąbie referred to is the one in Kraków (in Grzegórzki, Kraków), but I can't be sure - the Polish WP article doesn't specify either. The Babiak could be either one of at least two. As to why Zagórze in Sosnowiec was specially treated for so long, I imagine it's just because that was the article that was created first, and no-one got round to moving it when other articles were created. I actually prefer the dab page format with division by voivodeship, when there is a particularly long list - I suppose it's personal preference, but I find it easier to find things when a huge list is broken down a bit.--Kotniski (talk) 10:01, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Divisor classes
Template:Divisor classes has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:51, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Tom Connally
I agree with your 2008 discussion page note on Tom Connally and his famous so-called "Connally Reservation." I've added a section therein in my own clumsy prose. 173.175.52.101 (talk) 15:01, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 05:08, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Barticus88/WhatLinksHere.js
Very useful script, I love it!. However, it could be even more useful with the ability to sort links alphabetically. It should also be updated to account for the new Book: namespace. Thanks again. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 08:44, 18 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Sort is a lot of work. However, implementing a sort would also allow me to implement a copy and paste feature.  (Currently if you copy and paste, you get all the hidden items, becasue they are there just not displayed.)  Book: space should be easy.  How should it be handled?    Randall Bart    Talk   07:38, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I have no idea. It's content, so it should probably be incorporated into "DPL", plus have its own standalone mode? Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 11:52, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Divisor classes
Template:Divisor classes has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:03, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Merge
I've suggested merging Farangi (which you worked on) into Franks. I think this is better by WP policy and more useful to the readers. Jaque Hammer (talk) 20:55, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Caterpillar Club
You are in Edit history as an editor on this article. It has been multiply tagged for improvement as an alternative to being recommended for deletion. This is a request for editorial intervention to improve this article. Please help if possible.

Georgejdorner (talk) 17:39, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Requested edit to WhatLinksHere.js
Hi, Randall. Since the upgrade to MW 1.18, User:Barticus88/WhatLinksHere.js is not always behaving correctly. The issue can be fixed, I think, by changing the following line in the addOnloadHook function (near the end):

from:

to:

I didn't want to tinker with your script without your permission, hope you find this helpful. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 16:06, 8 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanx. I noticed a few days ago that the script was failing, but didn't research why.  I notice that "Edit this page", "History", "Move", and "Unwatch" are on the WLH page now, so I might want to move where my buttons are added.   Randall Bart    Talk   20:43, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Greetings
Hello, I somehow surfed in to your userpage, and I am a fellow Wikignome, too! I believe you are already doing the cleanup and copyediting, etc. here, and am hoping you will join those of us in this project. Also-- I wonder if you might consider making a couple of userboxes for me? I love your sense of humor; it sure helps working here! --Leahtwosaints (talk) 15:00, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Help with Texan/Texian consensus
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is ""Texan" versus "Texian"". Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crews Giles (talk • contribs) 04:10, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Invitation to events in June and July: bot, script, template, and Gadget makers wanted
I invite you to the yearly Berlin hackathon, 1-3 June. Registration is now open. If you need financial assistance or help with visa or hotel, then please register by May 1st and mention it in the registration form.

This is the premier event for the MediaWiki and Wikimedia technical community. We'll be hacking, designing, teaching, and socialising, primarily talking about ResourceLoader and Gadgets (extending functionality with JavaScript), the switch to Lua for templates, Wikidata, and Wikimedia Labs.

We want to bring 100-150 people together, including lots of people who have not attended such events before. User scripts, gadgets, API use, Toolserver, Wikimedia Labs, mobile, structured data, templates -- if you are into any of these things, we want you to come!

I also thought you might want to know about other upcoming events where you can learn more about MediaWiki customization and development, how to best use the web API for bots, and various upcoming features and changes. We'd love to have power users, bot maintainers and writers, and template makers at these events so we can all learn from each other and chat about what needs doing.

Check out the the developers' days preceding Wikimania in July in Washington, DC and our other events.

Best wishes! - Sumana Harihareswara, Wikimedia Foundation's Volunteer Development Coordinator. Please reply on my talk page, here or at mediawiki.org. Sumana Harihareswara, Wikimedia Foundation Volunteer Development Coordinator 20:00, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

User script list deprecation
Wikipedia's list of user scripts is in bad shape, in that it is disorganized and contains many non-working, unmaintained, or thoroughly obsolete entries. Cleanup has been on the to-do list since 2007, but little progress has been made. Instead, the whole list is now set to be deprecated on 1 May 2012, to be replaced with a new list. This draft list has been up for about a month, and in that time I've been soliciting script users and authors to come add scripts they know to be working and relevant.

If you know of scripts that you would like to survive this deprecation (and are confirmed working and relevant), you're welcome to add them to the new list. Note that the old list will be retained and linked from the main list, so there is no real deadline. Thanks for your help. <font face="Century Gothic" style="text-shadow:1px 1px 3px #999;"> Equazcion ( talk )  00:55, 22 Apr 2012 (UTC)

William Herbert Hunt
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: William Herbert Hunt. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:13, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of William Herbert Hunt


The article William Herbert Hunt has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Bgwhite (talk) 07:42, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Willie McCovey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page China Basin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Ping pong
Hello Barticus88. Though our Table tennis article claims that there was a 1901 trademark on 'Ping-pong' no reference is provided. Per WP:V the claim of a trademark may be removed if it can't be cited. So changing the hyphenation of a widely-used term based on something not verifiable might be argued about. See WP:COMMONNAME for the burden of proof. As it states there, Wikipedia "prefers to use the name that is most frequently used to refer to the subject in English-language reliable sources". Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 19:08, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Searching the internet, I find "ping-pong", "ping pong", and "pingpong" all in use, with the hyphenated form appearing to predominate. I didn't try to get stats.  Also http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ping-pong .  Which do you think is the most used form?      Randall Bart    Talk   19:37, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia Meetup
You are invited to "Come Edit Wikipedia!" at the West Hollywood Library on Saturday, July 27th, 2013. There will be coffee, cookies, and good times! -- Olegkagan (talk) &mdash; Message delivered by Hazard-Bot at 04:11, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia Meetup
Help build the Wikipedia community in Southern California at "Come Edit Wikipedia!" presented by the West Hollywood Library on Saturday, August 31st, 2013 from 1-5pm. Drop in for some lively editing and conversation! Plus, it's a library, so there are plenty of sources. --Olegkagan (talk) &mdash; Message delivered by Hazard-Bot at 01:26, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link fixing one-day contest
I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the November 2013 monthly disambiguation contest, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $20 Amazon.com gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day (see the project page for details on scoring points). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely nine edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I will credit links fixed by turning a WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412 T 01:54, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bowl Coalition, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1995 Sugar Bowl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

This Thursday: Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Getty Center
You are invited to join the Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Getty Center in LA on October 15! (drop-in any time, 10am-4pm)--Pharos (talk) 18:25, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Invitation to a research survey
Hello Barticus88, I am Qi Wu, a computer science MS student at the University of Minnesota - Twin Cities. Currently, we are working on a project studying the main article and sub article relationship in a purpose of better serving the Wikipedia article structure. It would be appreciated if you could take 4-5 minutes to finish the survey questions. Thanks in advance! We will not collect any of your personally information.

Thank you for your time to participate this survey. Your response is important for us!

https://umn.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_bvm2A1lvzYfJN9H

We're on Twitter!
RachelWex 03:18, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

7th Annual Los Angeles Wiknic
It's the 7th Annual Los Angeles Wiknic! Sunday, September 30, 11:00-4:00 PM Pan Pacific Park, 7600 Beverly Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90036 Hang out. Consume crowd-sourced BBQ! Bask in the glory of late September in Los Angeles (and the glory of our new user group, Wikimedians of Los Angeles). RSVP (and volunteer) here. We hope to see you there! JSFarman (talk) 02:50, 9 September 2018 (UTC) Join our Facebook group, or follow us on Twitter! To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.

User scripts Newsletter - Invitation
Hi. Recently, I discovered a passion for created and understanding user scripts on wikipedia, and am planning to create a monthly newsletter about new scripts and related projects (created by anyone, not for simply promoting my own), as well as currently pending user script requests, Wikipedia-related JavaScript tips/tricks, and other related information. This message was sent to you because you are listed as a member of the user script developers category. If you would like to subscribe to this upcoming newsletter, please go to User:DannyS712/subscribe to scripts and add yourself. If you have any questions, please reach out and talk to me. --DannyS712 (talk) 05:22, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Invitation to attend a Southern California Regional mini Unconference
Who: All Wikipedians & Wikimedians

What: Southern California Regional mini Unconference.

When: Sunday 3 March 2019, 2:00PM PST / 1400 until 4:10PM PST / 1610

Where: Philippe's at Chinatown, Los Angeles

Sponsor: San Diego Wikimedians User Group ( US-SAN )

Your host:

Please add your username to our attendees list so we know how many will be attending, due to the limited size of the cafe.

(Delivered: 00:38, 10 February 2019 (UTC) You can unsubscribe from future invitations to San Diego Wikimedians User Group events by removing your name from the WikiProject San Diego mass mailing list & the Los Angeles mass mailing list.)

Art + Feminism 2019
- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:05, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Southern California Wiknic & Bonfire invitation
<div style="; width: 550px; text-align: center; margin-right: 1em; border: 1px solid /777777;padding:0.5em 1.0em; background:#F5D020;background-image: radial-gradient(#74F2CE,#7CFFCB)"> Meetup-San Diego-September 2K19 Who: All members of the public

What: Southern California Wiknic & Bonfire.

When: Sunday 1 September 2019, 2:00PM PDT / 1400 until 10:00PM PDT / 2200

Where: La Jolla Shores

Sponsor: San Diego Wikimedians User Group ( US-SAN )

Your host:

Please add your username to our attendees list so we know how many will be attending, and please add your intended potluck contribution to the list.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject San Diego at 18:26, 1 August 2019 (UTC). You can unsubscribe from future invitations to San Diego Wikimedians User Group events by removing your name from the WikiProject San Diego mass mailing list, and from the Southern California meet-up group by removing your name from the LA meet-ups mailing list.

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Obsolete
Template:WikiProject Obsolete has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

"Uncaused cause" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Uncaused cause and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 18:43, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

"John Hunter(rowing)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Hunter(rowing)&redirect=no John Hunter(rowing)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 07:11, 15 November 2023 (UTC)