User talk:Bartle1

De havilland Albatross
Thanks for your message about your additions to the Albatross article, I appreciate you added it it in good faith but we dont normally include production lists in aircraft articles. If all the aircraft were notable for some reason then they can be mentioned. The fates of the aircraft are mentioned in the text under Operational history. Wikipedia should only have encyclopedic content which is notable, the internet has lots of websites for enthusiast information. If anything in your information is notable and has a reliable reference then it could be added to the page. Its a matter of getting the balance correct. If you are not happy with any of this then your are welcome to bring it up at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft. The aircraft project is where editors with an interest in creating and improving aircraft articles discuss what should and should not be included. Thank MilborneOne (talk) 13:57, 23 April 2009 (UTC)


 * OK I understand your point, but we have to note that this is an encyclopedia and plenty of websites exist for those interested in aircraft histories. We dont want to end up listing 20,000 odd Dakotas! I have added the list of aircraft in a textual rather than table format to make it more readable and interesting to readers. Some of the information is not really notable (like test registrations and construction numbers). I have added references which would allow the user to find more information. See what you think. MilborneOne (talk) 19:22, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)