User talk:Bartleby/Archive

Translation
Sure, just let me know what you mean.  // Halibutt 02:50, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Hollywood Undead
Eh, figures. Well, the prod seems about right. I've modified it to acknoledge the previous deletion. In case you ever need it, afdx is the template to use for multiple deletions. Put something like 2nd. Thanks and happy editing!!! - Corbin   ∫   1   ɱ   p   s   ɔ   ♫  Rock on, dude! 23:43, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Heads-Up Regarding Your 'Lost' Vote
The closing admin closed it in favor of keeping it, despite six delete votes, one merge/delete vote, one keep vote, and one transwiki vote. The matter is up for deletion review here and the article has been nominated for a second time here. As you were involved in the original process, I wanted to alert you so you could take action as you saw appropriate. I will not be adding your response to my watchlist, so please respond either to my talk page or to one of the two venues this is being discussed. &mdash; Mike • 04:04, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

EGS
The EGS entry was initially brought up for inveterate link spamming by an editor (probably affiliated with the school), but the discussion now centered around the rather baffling dearth of reliable third party sources on the school. Since the claims the school makes on its webpage are rather bold ("we have the top names in film, art and philosophy on our faculty") the article calls for good outside verification, but the material we dug up so far is almost all cyberscree. ~ trialsanderrors 17:06, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Yes, "Randian" is Hate Speech
Yes, words like "Randian" and "Randroid" are hate speech because they are designed to insult and degrade someone's opinion without bothering to debate the merits and weaknesses of that person's opinion. Simply using the term "Objectivist Movement" is less offensive. The Fading Light 15:24, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry but there has been this HUGE blowup on the Talk:Objectivism (Ayn Rand) about if the words "Randroid" and "Randian" should be considered hate speech. I think that since most Objectivists find both terms to be insults that they do count as hate speech (another example is that black people find the N-word offensive but despite that some white people use the word). The Fading Light 15:29, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The proper term is "Objectivist" (i.e. someone who follows the philosophy of Ayn Rand), the term "Randian" is used by people who not only don't agree with Objectivism but seek to degenerate it without arguing about it's merits. The Fading Light 15:53, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Fuck on the beach
Your second link doesn't appear to go anywhere... --InShaneee 00:40, 6 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Alright, I see it now. I'll tell you what: how about you start the article on a subpage (such as User:Deleuze/Fuck on the Beach) so I can get a better idea of how you plan to establish notability? --InShaneee 18:31, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!
I didn't know about the sinature, I thought every aticle had to be signed. Thanks! --Yardena 14:56, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Are you sure?
I'm not sure if this is the problem, I tryed the same kind of search with non capitalized articles and it worked... see List of Italian dishes. Thanks anyway. --Yardena 01:51, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Right! Now I won't make the same mistake. Thank you! --Yardena 05:36, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

How is the list overly broad?
Please see my response to your objection at Articles for deletion/List of food topics. --Transhumanist 20:47, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Nutrition list hacked to bits like you suggested
See Articles for deletion/List of nutrition topic lists. --Transhumanist 21:42, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Filmmaking changes
New discussion has started at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Filmmaking regarding expansion of the project. As a member, your comments are welcome and wanted! Thanks, Girolamo Savonarola 21:49, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks from CVU member
Thank you for reverting the horrible spam of Dralobv. Your work is really appreciated.-- MrFi s  h Go Fish 18:11, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Yonmei 21:15, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Dodgarand2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Dodgarand2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:05, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Girlfriend article
I suggest you find out what type of information an encyclopedia should include, and find out what (and what is not) vandalism. Please discuss things rather than engage in a revert war - it leads to solutions instead of statemates. violet/riga (t) 15:59, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

WP:FILMS Newsletter
The November 2006 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Cbrown1023 23:06, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

WP:FILMS Newsletter
The December 2006 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the Member List. Cbrown1023 00:26, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

WP:Films Newsletter
The January 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Nehrams2020 07:19, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Changing username/Usurpations
Greetings! After a long period of discussion and consensus building, the policy on usurping usernames has been approved, and a process has been set up to handle these requests. Since you listed yourself on Changing username/Requests to usurp, you are being notified of the adopted process for completing your request.

If you are still interested in usurping a username, please review Usurpation. If your request meets the criteria in the policy, please follow the process on Changing username/Usurpations. Please note that strict adherence to the policy is required, so please read the instructions carefully, and ask any questions you may have on the talk page.

If you have decided you no longer wish to usurp a username, please disregard this message. Essjay  ( Talk )  12:46, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

This message delivered by EssjayBot. Please direct any questions to Essjay.

WikiProject Films February Newsletter
The February 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Cbrown1023 talk 22:46, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

March WP:FILMS Newsletter
The March 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated notice by BrownBot 00:05, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Richard Kyanka
Hi, you made this edit referring to the previous one as vandalism. It was actually a merger, as decided on Talk:Something Awful. --Wafulz 15:34, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

April 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
The April 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated notice by BrownBot 21:01, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

May 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
The May 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated notice by BrownBot 21:37, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Blackmonktime.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Blackmonktime.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 14:31, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Genericflipper.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Genericflipper.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:03, 4 June 2007 (UTC)