User talk:BarunH/Archive 1

Super bot
Is there an efficient way to make global grammatical corrections without making use of a bot? Moreover, is it conceivable to design such a highly advanced bot that it is capable of constructive dialogue? Though they may on occasion seem effective, bots as we know them do not allow for intelligent attention to specific problems. Imagine a bot that encounters several unanticipated variations of a problem and is able to categorize and submit these back to its human editor for case-by-case review; the editor is then able to ascribe an appropriately variant solution to that subgroup and attain an overall higher success rate. I propose a reexamination of automated edit technology.—BarunH (talk) 06:17, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Wikilinks
Regarding your unlinking of "Larry Bird" at Celtics–Lakers rivalry, note that MOS:REPEATLINK allows repeating a link if it's the first instance after the lead. I've restored that one. On another note (and you weren't the one that introduced it), Bird (and many other names in that article) should be referred to just by their last name after their initial mention per MOS:SURNAME. Regards.—Bagumba (talk) 13:03, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Wasn't familiar with the MOS:REPEATLINK caveat. Cool, thanks.—BarunH (talk) 12:31, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Wikilinks II
I reverted most of your Kukoc edits at Chicago Bulls. Per MOS:REPEATLINK, repeating a link in a table is generally OK. The thinking is that readers could skim a table and not have seen an earlier link. Regards.—Bagumba (talk) 12:23, 3 May 2020 (UTC)