User talk:Barunology2

November 2018
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Barun Sobti. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. ''Diff: We're not interested in puffed-up commentary, or any other form of exaggeration. Decribing things as "popular", "prestigious", "iconic", "rave reviews", totally violates our policy on netural point of view. We're not here to advertise Barun Sobti. Additionally, don't remove citation requests without providing a citation.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:59, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Barun Sobti. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. ''Diff: Please stop adding puffery to the Barun Sobti article. It can be assumed that a person on television on a mainstream series would have fans. Adding this information just tends to puff up the importance of the article subject, which is not appropriate. And any opinion we include in an article must be directly attributed to the reliable published source that expressed that opinion. We are not here to perform advertising for Barun Sobti, and if that's what you're here for, please let me know so I can revoke your editing privileges.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:09, 9 December 2018 (UTC)