User talk:Bashahikgt

May 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Babita arora  06:09, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Megastar. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:19, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Hello, I'm VagaboundWind. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to [[Mohanlal]] because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. VagaboundWind (talk) 09:02, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. VagaboundWind (talk) 09:05, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mohanlal, you may be blocked from editing. VagaboundWind (talk) 14:13, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Amaury (talk) 14:37, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mohanlal, Loham. VagaboundWind (talk) 15:02, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mohanlal. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:20, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Mammootty biography
The content which the you copied from Mohanlal biography to Mammootty will be removed by any admin or other experienced editors. Extra ordinary claims need extraordinary sources, and sourcing is only one of the requirement, facts are more important. The sentence you copied from Mohanlal article was kept in the biography after several revisions and discussions among wikipedia admins and other reputed editors. VagaboundWind (talk) 16:45, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Block notice
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing, edit-warring and checkuser confirmed abuse of multiple accounts. I also believe there is a distinct possibility that you are User:Wiki-senetor evading their block. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ponyo (talk • contribs) 22:22, 8 May 2015 (UTC)