User talk:Basilicofresco/Archive1

Archive sep08-feb10

Tagish lake meteorite: ==

Hi there. First of all, I've been an editor here for several years, so I don't appreciate being pulled up on what the meaning of OR is. However you may need to review your naming conventions for articles. The term in the bracket is there to distinguish between articles of the same name. Tagish Lake is not the name of the meteorite, it's the place where it landed. To say that Tagish Lake is a meteorite is wrong, Tagish lake is a lake and the meteorite which landed in it is Tagish lake meteorite. If it landed somewhere else, say New York, it'd New York meteorite. Otherwise it's just a meteorite. It wasn't named Tagish Lake before it landed. Let's keep this discussion on the talk page - I've got it on my watchlist. Cheers, Spawn Man (talk) 02:13, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Wold Cottage
Thanks for straightening out the format on Wold Cottage. My quick fix was crude and I wanted to go back and correct it once I found out what the right format tag was. Appreciate you're doing so for me. 21:12, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

(not) Living people
I left a reply on my talk page about this (in order to preserve the context, etc.) on which you are more than welcome to comment, or not, whatever you fancy really. - Jarry1250 (t, c) 09:47, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

List of Rugrats episodes
Hey, I took a look at the episode section, and it's all fixed. I just dont know why someone changed them. --Wikialexdx (talk) 21:45, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token c7e3040a92b9ab4278e08f066d4cba95
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Salumi
Your definition is overly simplified, all salumi is not aged over 3 weeks. Both share the basics, as do the German variations on forcemeat production, along with the French charcuterie, which I only picked as the merged article as it had the most information which I used to merge the two article. Perhaps the article is best renamed something that multiple cultures share, neither making the title French or Italian centric, would you have a suggestion? I have some thoughts but would be open to hearing yours first.--Chef Tanner (talk) 01:12, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron


I notice that you are part of Category:Inclusionist_Wikipedians. I would like you to consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles for deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever. I think you will find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia.

Ikip (talk) 00:42, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Your bot request
Hi Basilicofresco I wanted to let you know that is labeled as needing your comment. Please visit the above link to reply to the requests. Thanks! --BAGBot Talk 04:13, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: Your repeated spamming of wikipedia with commercial websites
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.

Dear Basilicofresco. Are you the owner of the commercial websites that you repeatedly insist on linking to? If so, please stop spamming Wikipedia with your repeated links to commercial websites.

Wikipedia's rules against SPAMMING by COMMERCIAL websites are clear:

''External link spamming

Main articles: Links normally to be avoided and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest Adding external links to an article or user page for the purpose of promoting a website or a product is not allowed, and is considered to be spam. Although the specific links may be allowed under some circumstances, repeatedly adding links will in most cases result in all of them being removed."

"One should avoid Links to web pages that primarily exist to sell products or services". If you are still unclear on what a "commercial" website consists of try removing all of the URL except the root domain. If that leads to a site that exists primarily to sell products or services then you probably don't want to link to it.

If you still are not clear on which websites you have link to are COMMERCIAL websites then please review this listing of commercial meteorite websites: http://www.meteorite.com/dealer_list.htm

"Affiliate links Even if they are related to the subject or is an official page for the subject, external links containing affiliate or referral codes can be considered spam."

" The References section is for references. A reference directs the reader to a work that the writer(s) referred to while writing the article. The References section of a Wikipedia article isn't just a list of related works; it is specifically the list of works used as sources. Therefore, it can never be correct to add a link or reference to References sections if nobody editing the text of the article has actually referred to it."

ALL of the "references" and "external links" to commercial websites that were removed appeared to be rather blatant attempts by commercial websites to drive traffic to themselves. Are you affiliated with these commercial websites?

Here are some suggestions: Wikipedia Guidelines How not to be a spammer: "Contribute cited text, not bare links. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a link farm. If you have a source to contribute, first contribute some facts that you learned from that source, then cite the source. Don't simply direct readers to another site for the useful facts; add useful facts to the article, then cite the site where you found them. You're here to improve Wikipedia—not just to funnel readers off Wikipedia and onto some other site, right? (If not, see #1 above.)"

"Adding many links to (or mentions of) the same site or product. Going through an article and adding the name of your product to every paragraph where it seems relevant is just going to attract the revert button."

In other words, if you are really interested in improving wikipedia then please feel free to ask the owner's of the commercial websites that you are so interested in promoting to copy the content of the referenced page into wikipedia and reference it directly therein. Or, if they refuse to do so and you still find the commercial websites so compelling then please feel free to put their referenced webpage into your own words in wikipedia and then cite the commercial website as the source for your more meaningful contribution to wikipedia.

If you wish to add legitimate references to an article then please cite references that are properly attributed to the appropriate PRIMARY source, or authoritative original research work NOT some quaternary source on a commercial website. If you do not know the appropriate reference attributions then please refrain from editing any references. We suggest that if you really want to be a useful "contributer" that instead of violating Wikipedia's anti spamming rules you locate the Proper LITERATURE Citations to replace the Commercial Websites that you have repeatedly cited.

Until then please remove your commercial references and commercial external links or replace them with the Proper Citations.

Thank you for your prompt cooperation. Mannheim 34 (talk) 19:21, 16 March 2009 (UTC

2nd warning
Commercial sites rarely meet WP:Reliable sources guidelines, and are generally frowned upon as sources or links. Please stop adding sites that sell meteorites to Wikipedia. OhNo itsJamie Talk 19:37, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Basilicofresco STOP SPAMMING MY TALK PAGE WITH YOUR SPAM LINKS TO YOUR COMMERCIAL WEBSITES. YOU HAVE ALREADY BEEN WARNED TWICE ABOUT YOUR SPAMMING. ONCE BY ME ONCE BY ADMINISTRATOR OhnoitsJamie. NOW KNOCK IT OFF!

Mannheim 34 (talk) 16:28, 19 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment: the full story here and here. Well, never mind. DFT -- Basilicofresco  (msg) 23:53, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

HI
go to my page Fuzzyhair2 (talk) 15:44, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Carlo Viberti


The article Carlo Viberti has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * notability, verifiability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — V = I * R (talk to Ohms law) 16:26, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Heinrich Gratz,
Hello Basilicofresco. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Heinrich Gratz,, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a recently created redirect - consider WP:RfD. Thank you. Nancy talk  17:35, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Banque des Etats de l'Afrique Centrale,
Hello Basilicofresco. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Banque des Etats de l'Afrique Centrale,, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a recently created redirect - consider WP:RfD. Thank you. Nancy talk  17:37, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: African Americans,
Hello Basilicofresco. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of African Americans,, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a recently created redirect - consider WP:RfD. Thank you. Nancy talk  17:38, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Alleged 2007 Bomb Plot in Germany,
Hello Basilicofresco. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Alleged 2007 Bomb Plot in Germany,, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a recently created redirect - consider WP:RfD. Thank you. Nancy talk  17:38, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Good Night, Sleep Tight,
Hello Basilicofresco. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Good Night, Sleep Tight,, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a recently created redirect - consider WP:RfD. Thank you. Nancy talk  17:40, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Pyrenees-Atlantiques,
Hello Basilicofresco. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Pyrenees-Atlantiques,, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a recently created redirect - consider WP:RfD. Thank you. Nancy talk  17:41, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Xalisco,
Hello Basilicofresco. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Xalisco,, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a recently created redirect - consider WP:RfD. Thank you. Nancy talk  17:41, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Rathinam College of Arts and Science,
Hello Basilicofresco. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Rathinam College of Arts and Science,, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a recently created redirect - consider WP:RfD. Thank you. Nancy talk  17:42, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Perugia, Italy,
Hello Basilicofresco. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Perugia, Italy,, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a recently created redirect - consider WP:RfD. Thank you. Nancy talk  17:43, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Plaek Phibunsongkhram,
Hello Basilicofresco. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Plaek Phibunsongkhram,, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a recently created redirect - consider WP:RfD. Thank you. Nancy talk  17:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Red and Blue God, Black and Blue Church,
Hello Basilicofresco. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Red and Blue God, Black and Blue Church,, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a recently created redirect - consider WP:RfD. Thank you. Nancy talk  17:45, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Pyrénées-Atlantiques,
Hello Basilicofresco. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Pyrénées-Atlantiques,, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a recently created redirect - consider WP:RfD. Thank you. Nancy talk  17:46, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Samuel Parker,
Hello Basilicofresco. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Samuel Parker,, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a recently created redirect - consider WP:RfD. Thank you. Nancy talk  17:47, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Oweekeno-Kitasoo-Nuxalk Tribal Council,
Hello Basilicofresco. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Oweekeno-Kitasoo-Nuxalk Tribal Council,, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a recently created redirect - consider WP:RfD. Thank you. Nancy talk  17:48, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Everson Museum of Art,
Hello Basilicofresco. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Everson Museum of Art,, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a recently created redirect - consider WP:RfD. Thank you. Nancy talk  17:48, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Grand Theatre de Bordeaux,
Hello Basilicofresco. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Grand Theatre de Bordeaux,, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a recently created redirect - consider WP:RfD. Thank you. Nancy talk  17:50, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Greater Columbus-Auburn-Opelika,
Hello Basilicofresco. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Greater Columbus-Auburn-Opelika,, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a recently created redirect - consider WP:RfD. Thank you. Nancy talk  17:51, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Broadgates Hall, Oxford, speedy declined
WP:CSD,is for "Recently created redirects" this is more than a year old. Take to Rfd if you think it should go. DES (talk) 00:05, 6 February 2010 (UTC)


 * The same applies to Buckeye Ag Radio Network,. DES (talk) 00:08, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 * and to Archibald Thomas Peachey, DES (talk) 00:13, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 * and to Ascot Park, California, DES (talk) 00:29, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
Please stop tagging old redirects, contrary to WP:CSD DES (talk) 14:54, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 * To put that slightly less confrontationally, DES believes that it is not appropriate to delete these pages using speedy delete, and wants to establish a consensus on whether it is appropriate. Your opinion is welcome. DJ Clayworth (talk) 17:32, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I've started a discussion at Village pump (policy). DJ Clayworth (talk) 19:04, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

FrescoBot 2 approved
Your recent bot approvals request has been approved. Please see the request page for details. Josh Parris 10:22, 25 February 2010 (UTC)