User talk:Basket of Puppies/Archive 4

Thank you very, very much.
I greatly appreciate your closing of that ANI. I admit to lashing out, but I absolutely lost it when I saw the notice. Thank you for your support. Really. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 06:05, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * My pleasure. It was quickly becoming a dramafest and someone needed to step in and end it. You recognized your error and agreed not to repeat it. I don't really see any reason why to keep a conversation like that open any longer. Basket of Puppies  06:06, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I wish it had never been brought up in the first place, but at least it's been fixed. I hope this settles the matter.  :)  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 06:09, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Also, I am glad you did not retire permanently. Basket of Puppies  06:11, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Bless you. :)  I really appreciate that.  Ironically, I had retired permanently.  It was that article which brought me back and I figurerd that if I was going to help per the subject's request, I'd better jump back in the water and not edit from behind the "retired" template.  Real life is becoming busy, so while I won't be doing any whack-a-vandal, I haven't burned my bridge, so perhaps this is all for the best.  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 06:27, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor review
This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 20 April 2011 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding  to the review page will prevent further automated actions. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:25, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Looking for advice and guidance.
Thank you for putting together such a nice wiki article on SCSFLS. After 2 months of misery, I found a doctor this last monday who diagnosed me with SCSFLS. They couldn't identify the source of the leak, but did a blood patch in the middle of my spine, hoping that that would do the trick. They discharged me yesterday. My doctor left yesterday on a 2 week vacation. I seem to still have symptoms. I have questions, but nobody to ask that I can trust to give authoritative answers. This is an uncommon disease. Sadly, I now know more about my disease than my regular doctor.

I would be greatful if you would be willing to talk to me, or assist me in finding help and answers.

Please contact me at dharmon@alinatechnologies.com

Thanks, Dave Dharmon595 (talk) 23:12, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vermin Supreme


The article Vermin Supreme has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable individual. All reliable sources listed are not directly about the individual.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. William S. Saturn (talk) 06:45, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Vermin Supreme for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vermin Supreme is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Vermin Supreme until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ironholds (talk) 16:09, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Synagogue articles
Hi. Recently you have been nominating a lot of synangogue articles either for A7 deletion or AfD. Many (possibly most) of these congregations are likely to be notable. However, we have only a few editors who spend a lot of time on articles about places of worship. Therefore, nominating them all at once makes it a lot more difficult for people to address notability concerns within a short time frame. Could you possibly hold off on further nominations for now? JoshuaZ (talk) 17:50, 22 June 2011 (UTC)


 * I am cleaning up the synagogues that clearly lack notability. You are welcome to help in the effort. Thanks! Basket of Puppies  17:54, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Your comment that the synagogues in question "clear lack notability" seems to be problematic. See for example the example that caused me to notice your actions, the tagging of Beth Israel Congregation (Ann Arbor, Michigan) for speedy deletion, when the article itself states that it is the oldest synagogue in Ann Arbor. Similarly, your AfD of Cuban Hebrew Congregation seems to reflect not having looked for sources at all before AfDing the article. This is not helpful. Please slow down. JoshuaZ (talk) 17:59, 22 June 2011 (UTC)


 * I am confused. Are you trying to bring the AfD discussion to my talk page? That is entirely inappropriate. Please only discuss the merits of the congregations on their relevant AfD pages. Ok? Basket of Puppies  18:01, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The AfD is being as an example of the general haste which you are nominating articles. The point is that your actions are in general unhelpful, disruptive, and likely to provoke drama. Slowing down your nomination rate, or doing minimal Google news searches before nominating would both help a lot. JoshuaZ (talk) 18:06, 22 June 2011 (UTC)


 * The only thing unhelpful here is your attempt to circumvent process by harassing me. Basket of Puppies  18:10, 22 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi Basket. I've generally found you to be a very good editor, so I don't understand what's going on.  I share the concern that Joshua is trying to delicately convey to you here -- it is a concern that concerns not just one AFD, but the collection of them.  As you can see, some of your AFD nominations are meeting with 100 per cent disagreement.  The vast majority (if not all) are failing to garner consensus support.  I would suggest that you might take into consideration the consensus views of the community.  BTW -- Joshua is not, from what I can see, trying to harass you.  He is trying to "reach" you, through conversation on your talk page.  If he had ill intent, he would not be likely to do so.  In fact, editors, faced with the current situation, could without criticism bring an AN/I or an RFC/U.  This is by far the better, and more delicate, approach.  Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 03:04, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Notice
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Large number of synagogue article deletion proposals. Thank you.Jayjg (talk) 19:06, 22 June 2011 (UTC)