User talk:Basketballfan301/Journalism ethics and standards

Peer Review- GoKnights2021 -There are some opinionated statements in here that I think could be taken out like "the widespread power didn't really grab full attention till the early 1900's. Ward (2005)". While they're normally good transitions in a paper, I don't think you need them in a WIKI article. Just put them facts. Maybe instead, say a statistic about how much publicity it really got. Additionally, statements like this one- "It's a heavy toll for journalists to escape the everyday influences that can occur when trying to put information and content out for the world to see."- do not need to be included either. These sound good in an essay, but arent needed for WIKI. - There are some typos throughout like open ended quotation marks. I would check those out and see if you meant to quote something in those areas. -I think your headers make sense and their content is relevant and contributes to the understanding of ethics and standards. I think the section on purpose could be enhanced with some examples of unethical articles. I think this would also aid in explaining the need for journalism ethics. GoKnights2021 (talk) 15:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you so much for the feedback and i will make changes based of this feedback. Thank you for taking the time to help with this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Basketballfan301 (talk • contribs) 15:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)