User talk:Basketthou9

June 2021
Hello, I'm Rdp060707. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Survive (Nuclear Assault album) seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rdp060707&#124;talk 03:24, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Surfside condominium building collapse. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.  General Ization Talk  18:31, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Three Wednesdays of January for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Three Wednesdays of January is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Three Wednesdays of January until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bungle (talk • contribs) 19:30, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Timeline of the 2021 United States Capitol attack. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. ''There was consensus on the sister page (see Talk:2021_United_States_Capitol_attack) regarding how to refer to the attack. Please respect this consensus.'' WMSR (talk) 20:22, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on 2021 United States Capitol attack. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - Adolphus79 (talk) 20:20, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

September 2021
Hi! You have readded "Wednesday" to the Capitol attack article several times now, and have been reverted each time. You are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Doing so is not an acceptable way to make your desired change get through because it isn't collaborative. You are adding names of the days of the week to other articles too, but it's something that isn't really wanted; editors generally don't believe that such changes are an improvement because it's hard to tell what usefulness there is in this information. Wikipedia is made to be useful to readers, and changes need to have a comprehensible rationale in line with this purpose. Your level of disruptiveness isn't particularly severe, but it's still something that could lead someone to believe that you're not here to build an encyclopedia, which normally leads to a loss of editing privileges. — Alalch Emis (talk) 16:53, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

August 2023
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Kai Cenat Union Square riot, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Actualcpscmscrutinize, talk 07:37, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with August 4 riot. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you.  Stony Brook  babble 09:23, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

"August 4 riot" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=August_4_riot&redirect=no August 4 riot] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Stony Brook  babble 13:55, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

I have included your redirects August 4th riot and 8/4 riot to the above discussion. Please refrain from creating more redirects of this nature until consensus is reached for them. Thank you.  Stony Brook  babble 10:15, 21 August 2023 (UTC)