User talk:Basrasaab

May 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Agra, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''Do not change the order per your preference. It is maintained alpgabetically per MOS:LISTORG guidelines. Also maintain the WP:COMMONNAME of the article in the list which is "Shiv Dayal Singh" only. Wikipedia do not use honorifics per WP:NCIN and MOS:HONS policies. So terms like 'Seth', 'Ji', 'Shri', 'Maharaj' are not allowed'' Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:44, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Jaimal Singh, you may be blocked from editing. ''Stop adding honorifics. You are not following policies WP:NCIN and MOS:HON.'' Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:49, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Agra. Do not add honorifics. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:17, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Jaimal Singh. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:39, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

ANI Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:35, 3 May 2022 (UTC)


 * New discussion here at ANI. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:00, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
 You have been blocked from editing from certain namespaces ((Article)) for a period of 1 week because of WP:Unsourced and WP:DISRUPTION, adding/readding honorifics contravening WP:NCIN and MOS:HON. Please see ANI thread. Please address at ANI in that area. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions again. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 13:01, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jagat Singh (Sant). ''You were blocked for one week. I'll report you next time if you continue.'' Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:18, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 14:13, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 17:45, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note that this user is now evading block as . —  Wasell ( T ) 🌻 08:04, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for disregard for WP:NCIN and WP:COMMONNAME. again.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 09:39, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Continued disruption.
I've blocked you again, When your last block expired, you resumed your disruption. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Wikipedia does not use honorifics per WP:NCIN and MOS:HON policies. So terms like 'Seth', 'Ji', 'Shri', 'Maharaj' are not allowed'. You've been told this before. Your edit summary, "learn to respect spiritual gurus," tells me you are not here to build this encyclopedia, but to subject Wikipedia and its users to your religious practices and beliefs (I have my own which I keep out of the articles.) So, if you disrupt Wikipedia by editing without logging in and/or after this block expires, your next block will be without a set expiration. Thanks. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 14:56, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Removal of protection templates from protected articles.
Please stop your disruptive editing. Your removal of these templates does not remove the page protection. It does signal your intent to resume disruption. Please stop. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 12:04, 3 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Further, I have had to revert your changes to Jagat Singh (Sant) because of your flagrant disregard for the Manual of Style, particularly MOS:HONORIFIC. Further such edits will be dealt with as pure disruption. —C.Fred (talk) 15:35, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Looks like I'll need to fulfill my promise of an indefinite block.  -- Deep fried okra  ( talk ) 16:06, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ... disco spinster   talk  16:54, 3 July 2022 (UTC)