User talk:Bass77/Archive 0

December 2020 Guild of Copy Editors Newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:46, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Getjet Airlines edit
Hi, Neither Aviatic MRO, nor Dmitrij Celiadin or Povilas Padaiga is related to Getjet Airlines. Please create a separate page for Aviatic MRO, if this info seems necessary, since this info should belong under a its' page. AviationLogger (talk) 07:53, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the clarification, AviationLogger. I'll leave your changes as is, but I can't guarantee other editors will (because edit warring is considered a rule violation). If you can provide some sort of link that shows Aviatic MRO is unrelated (post it here or in the article's talk page), it could be valid reason to create the separate article. Best of luck.  Bass 77 talk contribs 16:28, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Article creation
Hye please how can I create an article about a popular teacher Sulehaido (talk) 05:37, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, Sulehaido. To make an article, you need to start first with a draft article. You can write a draft by going to "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Title", replacing "Title" with the name of your article. Click "start the page" and then write what you want. When you're done, add to the top of the page. Then, it either gets approved or rejected by a Wikipedia administrator (I am not one of them). Good luck!    Bass 77 talk contribs 07:28, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Probable LTA
Special:Contributions/PoeTheJlumber is probably Sockpuppet investigations/John Daker. Revert on sight. BilCat (talk) 01:46, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know, BilCat. Will do.  Bass 77 talk contribs 01:56, 16 June 2021 (UTC)


 * It could be someone else, but it certainly is their type of edit pattern. It's vandalism either way. BilCat (talk) 02:10, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Jean Mouroux has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jean Mouroux. Thanks! Hatchens (talk) 06:37, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I apologize for the question. I'm new to submitting drafts and hope this doesn't make me sound like a rube, but what exactly was wrong with the reference list? I know the article lacks inline citations, but that's because the Cite book references are from the page on Spanish Wikipedia, which my draft is a direct translation of. Why is that sufficient for a start-class article there but not here? I'm not trying to contest the decision, I simply want to learn more about the policy for future reference. Thanks in advance,  Bass 77 talk contribs 07:03, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Also noting that I did include the no footnotes template at the top of the article as per Help:Translation. Is this help page incorrect? Do I still need to have in-line citations for a draft translation?  Bass 77 talk contribs 07:11, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , thank you raising valid questions. I would suggest .. just reformat the draft and try to source more Citations from Google Scholar or Google Books and then resubmit for review. - Hatchens (talk) 16:33, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , Thank you for the response, I appreciate it. I found some relevant citations and added them. Have a nice day!  Bass 77 talk contribs 17:42, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jean Mouroux (June 17)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hatchens was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jean Mouroux and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jean Mouroux, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Jean_Mouroux Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hatchens&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Jean_Mouroux reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hatchens (talk) 06:38, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

RAF Spadeadam
Dear Bass77, I have to disagree with your assessment that my revisions to the RAF Spadeadam article have changed the meaning of the sections and are therefore not ‘constructive’ to the article.

On the contrary, my editing has expanded on the original text and provided amplification on certain topics which were very poorly expressed initially. The text also reads better, flows and is grammatically correct. There were elements of the original text which did not even make sense.

You have edited my text to now read ‘ Some of the equipment was manufactured in the Soviet Union; some simulated emissions from potential enemy systems.’ This has completely changed the meaning of this sentence. I was making the point that Spadeadam has a mix of old Soviet era equipment and modern systems which can replicate the radar emissions of more up to date enemy systems. Your changes have completely eradicated that point.

With the greatest respect, as a serving Royal Airforce Officer, I am much better placed to write and speak with some authority about the place where I live and work. I wonder if you have ever visited the location of which you feel eminently qualified to comment on.

For completeness, your phase ‘ ground-based electronics warfare equipment ’ is wrong. It is electronic warfare not ‘electronics’ warfare. As a practitioner of this black art, if I wrote that in any documentation, I’d be laughed out of town.

Your amendment ‘aircrews’ is grammatically incorrect. Aircrew is the correct terminology. Like sheep, they can be singular or plural.

You may also wish to know that there is only one dummy airfield.

I spent a considerable amount of time carefully choosing my words to accurately convey the precise history and current activity of Spadeadam without compromising any security sensitivities. I am unsure why you saw fit to drive a cart and horses through my improvements.

I am of course happy to discuss this further.

Warmest regards, Hectoronimus Hectoronimus (talk) 08:24, 18 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello, . Thank you for your thoughtful reply. I just want to let you know my edit was only a result of my personal opinion, and you may be right and I might be wrong. That means that you are free to change the article back to how you had it if you want.


 * My edits were simply changing the article back to exactly how it was before you edited it, so really nothing has changed (this is called reverting the page, and there is an undo button in the page history for it). If you would like, you can revert it back to your version, or edit it again to your liking. I won't change a thing this time :)


 * But please know that if other editors also think that the changes made were not necessary and could have changed the meaning of the article, they can also revert it back like I did, and repeatedly reverting it more than about three times in a row is against Wikipedia policy. Happy editing! Thanks,  Bass 77 talk contribs 22:12, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello Bass77, As you clearly know more about the mysterious inner workings of Wikipedia, grateful if you could extend me the courtesy of undoing the changes yourself please. Many thanks. Hectoronimus (talk) 14:33, 19 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Sure, . I can do that for you soon. Have a good day.  Bass 77 talk contribs 05:04, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Alandi
Hiii I AM proper in Alandi Yash tapkir (talk) 08:11, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the correction.  Bass 77 talk contribs 05:04, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jean Mouroux has been accepted
 Jean Mouroux, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Jean_Mouroux help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Devonian Wombat (talk) 09:45, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Alandi
Don't change history alandi Devachi Kalbhor-patil is original history Yash tapkir (talk) 05:29, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Please 🙏🏻 don't change Alandi history kalbhor Patil is original history and Kalbhor-patil is proper Alandi Devachi Yash tapkir (talk) 05:30, 23 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello, . I'm sorry to let you know that I only changed the Alandi page once. If it got changed again, it was by someone else. So I can't really help you there.


 * This might help you though. I know it's a hassle, but if you add a citation people generally won't remove what you put. Click this link for help with doing that. Good luck!  Bass 77 talk contribs 19:17, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Two Accounts
Dude, may you help me. I don't want my account got removed/terminated Rizky Ramadhan Soundwave (talk) 15:14, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, . Please do not worry about it! Having a second account is not against the rules as long as you don't edit with both at the same time or pretend to be different people using the two accounts.


 * I don't think you're doing that, so you are not in any trouble. The message I sent you was just to let you know the rules, so I apologize if it sounded threatening. Thanks,  Bass 77 talk contribs 19:17, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

GOCE June 2021 newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 12:37, 26 June 2021 (UTC).

September 2021 Guild of Copy Editors newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:43, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

December 2021 GOCE Newsletter
Distributed via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:02, 6 December 2021 (UTC)