User talk:BassRabbit

Your Recent edit
Hello. I've seen that you have been continuously been removing the "happycore" genre from the Stupid Hoe article. Please read the happycore article before you get to upset about it being on the page. Thanks, --  Gourami Watcher   (Gulp) 18:12, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

I've read it. I've read it a million times. I've been listening to happy hardcore for years. And I still can't find any justification as to why you would label that song under the same name. Just because it has the same speed doesn't mean it's the same music. The song is hip-hop, nothing more.


 * By what I've read on the article (and by listening to the song 200 times) I have to disagree with you. What I've read one the article, the song seems to match the genre. I suppose you could ask a more experienced user if you are not convinced. --  Gourami Watcher   (Gulp) 00:16, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Let me help you out a bit. THIS is what is defined as happy hardcore, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hX81VF7mdRM. Now tell me. How on Earth can you possibly draw comparison between this and Stupid Hoe? Hell, this doesn't even sound like the old-skool stuff. (Like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DOhPkrZ0ffI ). I don't care what article you read or how many times you listened to that god-awful song. IT. IS. NOT. HAPPY HARDCORE.
 * Both of you need to stop listening to bad music and start reading our policy on reliable sources, at WP:RS--reliable, published sources will settle the dispute, nothing else. Drmies (talk) 21:54, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay Drimes, riddle-me-this. If the song clocks in at 150 BPM (as said by the bullshit source claiming it to be inspired by "happy hardcore and drill n' bass", then why, OH WHY, do you have it labeled under happy hardcore, a genre that is listed ON THIS VERY SITE to be, "between 160-180 BPM"? Ban me from the site if you want to, but that song is not fucking happy hardcore.
 * Eh, you can bullshit and fuck all you want, but that doesn't change the fact that you need reliable sources to verify anything (GouramiWatcher, the same applies to you). If you don't agree with a source, well, tough shit--if the source is reliable, they're right and you're wrong even if you're right, basically. On a sidenote, this constant fighting over genres is really quite amusing when you're looking at it from the outside. Drmies (talk) 00:18, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I really don't give a shit how "amusing" it is. That song is not happy hardcore and nothing is going to convince me otherwise. The source is wrong, and anyone who believes it is wrong.

July 2012
Your recent editing history at Stupid Hoe shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Drmies (talk) 21:52, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Hey, Drmies. If a real happy hardcore song isn't a reliable source, then I don't know what is. Why don't you educate me a bit on that (and also on what you define as 'bad music'. Hixxy is amazing.)?
 * Hey, BassRabbit. I can make like I don't have a clue what you're talking about and still answer your question: to verify a genre you need to cite a reliable source (WP:RS)--you are not a reliable source (and neither is your opponent, without evidence anyway). Listening to it and giving your judgment is a no-no in an encyclopedia--it's at best primary and at worst original research. See WP:SECONDARY. Happy days, Drmies (talk) 00:14, 7 July 2012 (UTC)