User talk:Bassiltala

Your hangon rationale
You stated, ''its a historical documentation of a non-profit organization that is 40 years old. It does not look like advertisement at all.''

Let me see:
 * It is dedicated to promoting... that looks like an advertizement to me.
 * The story of (...) is the story of hope... that looks like an advertizement to me.
 * Core Values... that looks like an advertizement to me.
 * Our... that looks like an advertizement to me.
 * ™... that looks like an advertizement to me.
 * (...) believes that (...) deserve the opportunity ... that looks like an advertizement to me.

...And it goes on. --  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 17:02, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Status and Advice
You've done exactly the same thing three times.

A Wikipedia article needs to show notability with references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. It also needs to be written like an encyclopedia article, not a press release--don't praise the organization or person, say what they do. Don't talk about the overall importance of the subject--talk about what they have accomplished. Remember not to copy from a web site, even your own -- first it's a copyright violation, but, even if you own the copyright and are willing to give us permission according to WP:DCM, the tone will not be encyclopedic and the material will not be suitable.

Include only material that would be of interest to a general reader coming across the mention of the subject and wanting the sort of information that would be found in an encyclopedia. Do not include material that would be of interest only to those associated with the subject, or to prospective clients--that sort of content is considered promotional. Keep in mind that the goal of an encyclopedia is to say things in a concise manner, which is not the style of  press releases or  web sites, which are usually more expansive.

As a general rule, a suitable page will be best written by someone without Conflict of Interest; it's not impossible to do it properly with a conflict of interest or as a paid press agent, but it's relatively more difficult: you are automatically thinking in terms of what the subject wishes to communicate to the public, but an uninvolved person will think in terms of what the public might wish to know.

Since there seems no evidence that you will  do it right according to our guidelines, I've prevented article re-creation for two weeks, to provide a chance to gather materials. I've also blocked this account, and all related accounts for a similar time