User talk:BassoProfundo

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Cheers,  Tewfik Talk 00:59, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Welcome to Novels WikiProject
Hi, and welcome to the Novels WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to fiction books often refered to as "Novels".

A few features that you might find helpful:


 * Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
 * The announcement and open task box is updated quite regularly. You can watch it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including WikiProject_Novels_announcements there. While you are updating your userpage, don't forget our userbox User WikiProject Novels.
 * The project has a monthly newsletter; it will normally be delivered as a link, but other methods are available.

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:


 * Starting some new articles? Our article structure guidelines / template outlines some things to include.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the members, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Grey Shadow 11:13, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue IV (September 2006)
The September 2006 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 12:34, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue V - October 2006
The October 2006 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 20:37, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VI - November 2006
The November 2006 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 21:52, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VII - December 2006
The December 2006 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 23:18, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VII - December 2006
The January 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 19:40, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Novels newsletter : Issue IX - February 2007
The February 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 16:35, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Novels
Notice you left the project - sorry to see you go, all the best. :: Kevinalewis  :  (Talk Page) / (Desk)  08:58, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank You
I wanted to thank you, along with the others, who have helped clean up the vandalism of the Warhammer pages, aka, the actions of User:XxXlukeyboiXxX. SanchiTachi 02:14, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Mingering MIke
Hold off dude, I just lost a whole paragraph that's not even in the history anymore.M4bwav 21:16, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Somehow that got dropped when I removed the speedy deletion template. If you look at the differences between the last two templates, you may be able to find it. --BassoProfundo 21:18, 9 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I just rewrote it, I assume we are cool now. Have a good dayM4bwav 21:30, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Social Consulting Group

 * ''Note: I moved this message from Penn1740 from my main user page, where it was originally posted.  BassoProfundo 20:39, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

I posted this re: social consulting group

This page is not an advertisement, but merely an article I thought could add to the collective knowledge available in Wikipedia. I made this article in the true spirit of the "wiki" ideas because I heard about this small startup company a friend of a friend created, saw his website, and thought it to be a novel idea. I plan to clean-up and add more factual information about origins and progress of the company shortly, but being a new user I am still tinkering in the sandbox on perfecting my wikipedia format.

Let me know what you think, I am lookign at other wiki articles about companies and trying to get ideas  on how to rework it. Also, I dont believe that just because the article is small it should be unfairly discriminated agaisnt, this is a very small and very new company, but informationr regarding it ( however much or little is currently available) is still knowledge that serves the common good. There is no conatact info, no pricing guides, just a description of its short history and its mission as an active member of its community economy. I dont mean to be on a crusade, and I understand that abuse of wikipedia can not be tolerated, but seeing as this is not abuse and intentions are good, I feel like it should be allowed to stay and flourish, if in some time you feel that the article has becoem no mroe than a commercial, then we can revisit this point. Thanks

Re: Speedy deletion template on Vivian Owens
Hi there, thanks for the message. For an article to be speedily deleted there must be no assertion of notability. I wouldn't delete an article that stated the subject had written nine books, to me that's an assertion of notability (plus I had a look at www.amazon.co.uk to see if any of her books were currently available). However, as I'm sure you're aware that's not necessarily the end of the story. Even if notability is asserted the subject may not be notable enough to deserve a Wikipedia article, that's where discussion and consensus play their part. If you nominate an article for deletion at WP:AFD a discussion begins whereby the community at large can debate whether the subject is notable enough to be kept. Or, if you're sure an article should be delete it you can WP:PROD it. Deletion happens after five days unless anyone objects, if anyone does for any reason the prod is removed and if you still think it should go you would then have to go to AFD. I would advise you to look carefully at WP:CSD as the rules for what can be deleted speedily are pretty tight but they need to be to prevent good articles being deleted simply because they're not yet well written and simply need improvement. If you need any more info, let me know. I can't promise a quick reply over the weekend but I will try or you can just grab the nearest passing experienced user. I hope this helps though. Malla nox  18:29, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of South Beach (nightclub)
I think I edited to the point where it provided the outstanding information. The article does not just appear to be an advertisement anymore. By the way do you go to BU? I have this feeling that you do. I think I might know you. In any case, my article is ready.

Userboxx
Yes, I understand what you mean. Can you help me with that? Too late now, I Think Iam a bit bit sleepy...
 * Hello Basso! Can you have a look at this?
 * Maybe Iam a bit lost...
 * Well, actually my goal is to create a userbox and enale to all other users.
 * By criating a Ludovicapipausebox, what do you mena? A "personal" usebox?
 * Do you want me to sign all msgs? -- Ludovicapipa msg 17:13, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I thought that one signature would be enough, as long as I write the msg within this space...
 * Do you know if there is any problem with the dimensions of it? It looks "out of the page"... -- Ludovicapipa msg 22:23, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

-- Ludovicapipa msg 02:58, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Marucci
Hey, can you take a look again at that page for Marucci Bat Company? I don't work for the company, I just read about it and heard mention of it on ESPN tonight; since some of the bigger names of baseball are using it, I reckon it is as worthy for an article as Hillerich & Bradsby aka Louisville Slugger

Pokemon Flynon Version
Dude you got a serious problem. Well why are you checking people's userpages. anyway, he will reference the article soon.

User:Wflynn12's USLister.com on List of search engines
Maybe best to leave this persistant addition there until the article gets deleted. Then there is zero excuse to have the link and if he recreates the article there are further steps that can be used to stop the mess (prohibit article creation, block the user, etc). DMacks 15:39, 28 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Good point. I'll leave it up until we have the precedent of the article's deletion. BassoProfundo 15:42, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Love to Infinity
Hi! I reviewed your CSD nomination for this article and I believe it does assert notability because it claims the band is "platinum selling". It doesn't verify the claim and the band may well ultimately not be notable or verifiable. Suggest using the regular AfD process to determine this. Best, --Shirahadasha 02:20, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for catching that. The article did not have that claim when I originally nominated it, but thank you for pointing out the change. BassoProfundo 02:23, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Sorry about that ..
I clicked the wrong link on my anti-vandal tool, and then IE hung, so it took a while to reverse it. Sorry for the hassle. Philip Trueman 18:23, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Earth, Inc. page
Thanks for the note, if I make some changes to it, would you mind reevaluating it? It's not meant to be a promotional page and I will add a tidbit about why it's significant. --Eppyie 19:55, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Hi BassoProfundo, can you take a look (User:Eppyie/Earth, Incorporated) to see whether it now satisfies wikipedia's requirements? Thanks. --Eppyie 01:18, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Hey, would you mind taking a look at this page again and let me know what I need to change to make it a viable wikipedia page. Thanks --Eppyie 17:39, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Cindy Emch
An article that you have been involved in editing, Cindy Emch, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Cindy Emch. Thank you. Optigan13 (talk) 07:20, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

trans woman vs. transwomen
Hi, I'm not going to oppose these changes as I'm not sure there exists any definitive way to prove which should be used ... but ... please don't cite the non-consensus at one talkpage - a "local consensus" in wikispeak. Simply state it's more grammatical in your opinion or something. In this way if others object or revert we can see if a more formal discussion should take place. This is better in the long run, if no one opposes then no issue for now, if someone does we don't want to imply a final decision was made. Go for it but leave the door open for dissent please. -- Banj e b oi   22:09, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi again, please work to show we have consensus rather than just state we have it. I'd like to see some compelling reason to go with one vs the other as I haven't seen evidence either way that is definitive. -- Banj e b oi   00:45, 9 August 2009 (UTC)


 * As I stated (again) at Talk:Transwoman, we have consensus because there is *no opposition* to the objections raised, while at the same time there are several people confirming those objections. One term is offensive; the other is not. What else are you looking for? BassoProfundo (talk) 00:51, 9 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Not exactly. There are at least three editors saying you should stop until we actually have some reliable sources that support your point of view. I've seen nothing presented yet on either transman or transwoman that definitively shows one is better or preferred than the other. At this point I'll make it clear - please stop. Discuss and help come to an informed decision with reliable sourcing that shows one version is preferred. Many people object to gay, queer, homophile, invert and homosexual but we have articles on them all. We are an encyclopedia and our standards are not the same as a blog, a book or a magazine. Please discuss this issue before continuing with your mass changes. -- Banj e  b oi   01:49, 9 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Those are, yet again, objections to change rather than objections to the term "trans woman." I will stop, but I nevertheless object to this tactic of halting changes for the sake of purely hypothetical objections. BassoProfundo (talk) 01:54, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I appreciate your willingness to discuss. The issue isn't that you are right or wrong, the issue is we don't know. It's better to have an authentic consensus based on reliable sources so we get the right decision, not just the one five folks at that time prefer. If we have a decision based in sourcing it helps us know what is the correct spelling for when teh next person comes along and insists it should be trans wymmin and we are insulting everyone by not spelling it that way. We want to has a healthy discussion now and it solves a lot of problems down the road for all concerned. We need to do due diligence and update the article accordingly so the world has the best information. -- Banj e  b oi   02:17, 9 August 2009 (UTC)


 * We have, among other things, the citation to the Serano book, which is also outlined in the Trans woman article itself. I love to have as solid a case as possible concerning the usage of "transwoman," but at the very least there are already objections from published sources, the talk page, and that blog post among others (which demonstrates that this opinion exists, whether or not any independent sources note them). I will note once again that there has been absolutely no objection to the term "trans woman" other than that it would require a change which might later be reversed. It is incredibly annoying to be asked not to be bold just because somebody might hypothetically disagree with the usage of "trans woman." BassoProfundo (talk) 02:31, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The only sourcable item is the Serano book, the rest is opinion. It's better to get it right so let's see what reliable sources have to say on the issue and work toward a consensus. -- Banj e  b oi   04:04, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Hangon-warn
Template:Hangon-warn has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:13, 28 September 2017 (UTC)