User talk:Bassriley

Stage Right!
The problem with what you are doing on the Stage Right! article is that you are sourcing all the content to a primary source. Anyone can set up a website and allege anything, so Wikipedia cannot use these as sources, particularly when dealing with controversial claims that could be considered libellous. Instead it requires secondary sources, that is we need a third party of some authority, notability and neutrality to report on it. Please do not continue to add the content you've done so far without a cite to a suitable source that isn't www.stagerightsurvivors.com. Thanks. -- Escape Orbit (Talk) 12:03, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Please don't keep reverting things back into this article that have been challenged and removed. There are a number of problems with what you are doing;

-- Escape Orbit (Talk) 10:01, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
 * The article does not need to start with a description of who reported it. The cite does that.  If it hadn't been reported in a reliable source, it wouldn't be permitted to be there.
 * The article should focus on the issue, not how the issue was reported.
 * These are allegations, and need to be neutrally described as such. Calling them "firsthand accounts" suggests that they are accepted fact.
 * Calling them "numerous" is a matter of opinion and inexact.  How many is numerous?  10, 50, 1000?  The reader isn't told other than being given the impression that Wikipedia is of the opinion that there are a lot.  Wikipedia doesn't have opinions.
 * Are you sure you do not have a conflict of interest in adding this to Wikipedia?