User talk:Bastun/List

I see no portion of WP:GFDL that I have breached. If you believe there was a breach, please specify which section was breached, and how. Bastun BaStun not BaTsun 12:01, 21 April 2007 (UTC)


 * It's pretty blatant, you've copied and pasted the work of other people. It's a wholly unneccesary page, all you needed to do was post a link on the original article's talk page to an older version of the page before you removed the names. One Night In Hackney 303 12:03, 21 April 2007 (UTC)


 * No, I edited the work of others and contributed corrections and amendments. It was discussed extensively at Talk:List of members of the Irish Republican Army, including admin involvement, and no alternative suggestions to what I had proposed eight days ago were forthcoming.  Again - please specify which section of WP:GFDL was breached, and how. Bastun BaStun not BaTsun 12:15, 21 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Copy and paste move of other people's work, it's pretty simple. Simple question, could this present page be just as simply served by a link to a previous version of List of members of the Irish Republican Army on Talk:List of members of the Irish Republican Army. Answer - yes. One Night In Hackney 303 12:18, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

i wanna c how this isnt important its like history..dont delete it!!


 * If its pretty simple, then you should have no problem pointing out the section of WP:GFDL was breached. Please do so. Bastun BaStun not BaTsun 12:22, 21 April 2007 (UTC)


 * I just did, try reading. Also I notice you haven't answered the question, cleary because I'm correct. One Night In Hackney 303 12:23, 21 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Help me out here, ONiH. I'm familiar with the GFDL, and I don't know of/can't see any problem in what I've done.  So do me a favour - quote me the section I've breached.  As for could this present page be just as simply served by a link to a previous version of List of members of the Irish Republican Army on Talk:List of members of the Irish Republican Army?  No.  Which version would you link to?  A good one containing the working links of the older IRAs?  That doesn't indicate what articles need work.  A later one with all the redlinks?  No, because as has been made clear by an admin, they can't stay. Bastun BaStun not BaTsun 12:42, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

I'll make this very simple for you. Please tag the page with db-author or I'm moving it to a sub-page of your userspace, as we don't want it here. One Night In Hackney 303 12:44, 21 April 2007 (UTC)