User talk:Bathhousefan69

October 2021
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Baane247 (talk) 18:20, 24 October 2021 (UTC)


 * & Updated to remove controversial wording. Left sentence about local reaction, and statements from county commissioners - it's important that the local reaction be noted (which I've done factually and with citation of their actual statement via YouTube.) I also updated with an excerpt from Buckle's retraction letter- with citation.


 * Isn't citing their actual statement via YouTube a primary source problem? Shouldn't this be done with secondary and tertiary sources?
 * Why revert my correcting the spelling of McKay's name in the lead?
 * Why delete information about McKay's business and previous offices that was there before you added this new material?
 * I've restored my correction that the letters were sent just to West Virginia officials, not to Maryland officials, per the source you used.
 * I've removed the excessive quote from the Buckel article and summarized it. It was ridiculous to have over half the article be a quote from the subject on this one issue.
 * -- Pemilligan (talk) 19:51, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
 * -- Pemilligan (talk) 19:51, 30 October 2021 (UTC)