User talk:Bathshua

November 2021
Hello, I'm TylerBurden. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Paul Conroy (music executive), but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   TylerBurden (talk) 06:08, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello Tyler I believe you made a mistake. The information I entered was accurate Bathshua (talk) 06:19, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

I have a copy of Paul Conroy's birth certificate Bathshua (talk) 06:20, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

I also have a copy of his son's birth certificate as well as his marriage certificate and the birth certificates of their children Bathshua (talk) 06:20, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

These certificates are private and obviously I would not upload them online Bathshua (talk) 06:20, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Not to mention I personally know Paul Conroy Bathshua (talk) 06:20, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

If you can't add verifiable sources to support your edits, then I'm afraid it's still breaching Wikipedia policy regardless if you know him or not. --TylerBurden (talk) 06:43, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

You don't give anyone any time to edit and add information
You don't give anyone enough time to add citations. You just flag it immediately. You know that as opposed to removing an entire piece of information you can simply suggest citation needed? Bathshua (talk) 06:45, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

I'd rather Wikipedia remain accurate and have content supported by references than Wikipedia being full of unverified speculation. --TylerBurden (talk) 06:50, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Yeah but once again you don't give people enough time to edit anyting. I'm a new user to Wikipedia and I don't know how to navigate as quickly as you might. I'm still learning so as opposed to flagging something immediately you might want to give it some time Bathshua (talk) 06:52, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

That's fine, I gave you plenty of useful information in the first message I left here. Take as much time as you need to make sure your edits are constructive, I am also quite new and made the same mistake as you at first, it's good to learn from your mistakes and take your time when making contributions. --TylerBurden (talk) 06:55, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia states that you don't need to cite general knowledge. Much of what was added to the article was already in it especially names of spouses. Bathshua (talk) 07:06, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

I don't think information about this man qualifies as general knowledge. Actually out of all the sources, seemingly only one of them still appear to function. But you are correct about the name of his wife, feel free to add it. --TylerBurden (talk) 07:23, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

What you may think seems subject. But that's okay. I'll add his spouse's name back as well as the infobox. Feel free to check my citation of public knowledge. Bathshua (talk) 07:57, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

It's not really subject, general knowledge are things like 1+1=2, not family details about Paul Conroy. What is general knowledge to you or to those around you might differ from what is general knowledge to everyone that uses English Wikipedia. But that's good that you're adding sources now, happy editing and good luck with the article. --TylerBurden (talk) 08:14, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Subjective not subject. That was a typo. I believe general knowledge should be anything that can be easily looked up online or known about somebody. Anyway thank you for your consensus. Glad we agree on something. Bathshua (talk) 08:19, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Crystella Marie


A tag has been placed on Crystella Marie requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Uncle Spock (talk) 07:12, 22 April 2023 (UTC)