User talk:Batmanikk

Speedy deletion nomination of Swaggot
Hello Batmanikk,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Swaggot for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Marlight (talk) 22:59, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

---

Hi Batmanikk,

I filed the report for the reasons elaborated above. The subject of the article seems not important enough to be part of an encyclopaedia, mainly because it is a word or term definition and because it seems that the information you give about this term are not properly backed up by references. I am not saying anything against you or your writing here of course. However, I did not see the importance of having an own article about "Swaggot" outside of sites like urbandictionary etc. Since I did not delete the article on my own and only flagged it as being inappropriate, I think that the mod who made the decision to delete it agreed with my feelings towards it.

Marlight — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marlight (talk • contribs) 14:10, 25 December 2013 (UTC)