User talk:Battloglio/Gammaproteobacteria

The structure of the article is interesting and easily readible. It is important to note that all the essential things within the article are very well highlighted and easily visible. Even someone who is not in this field of study can understand more than a fact from the article. I just found some sentences you should review. In the paragraph "Metabolism" you wrote "Among Gammaproteobacteria there chemoautotrophic sulfur-oxidizing groups", you probably forgot to add ARE between the words "there" and "chemoautotrophic". Plus, i would review the sentence "Thanks 16S rRNA......................................Thiomargarita", which is in the metabolism paragraph as well. But, otherwise, you have done a great job!--Marty ariel97 (talk) 14:43, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi everyone, the article is well done, easy to understand. I have nothing to say, only a suggestion: you could rearrange the order of the paragraphs putting "significance and application" and "ecology" at the end of the article so that the informations about metabolism, symbiosis and pathogens are immediately read. Anyway good job! --Chiaraga96 (talk) 16:31, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your suggestions and feedback. It will help us to improve our work!Battloglio (talk) 10:18, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello everyone, by looking at the article nothing to say about the contents, well-stocked and structured. The reader immediately sees the heart of main topics and the various sections are exhaustive and in-depth. The only advice is to review the punctuation in some points and with regard to the 'Significance and applications' section to place it at the bottom, highlighting 'Metabolism', 'Symbiosis', 'Pathogens' as initial sections. Add a few lines in the final section 'See also'. --BabboNatale0096 (talk) 15:48, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi everyone, I really enjoyed your article since it is full of infos and links. I'd advice you to adjust the Beggiatoa example in the introduction part, you can add "mat formers (e.g. Beggiatoa)", I think it sounds better since is a feature which concerns Beggiatoa more than "symbiosis", anyway good job! Vinc.petrillo (talk) 18:31, 6 December 2020 (UTC)