User talk:Bauerkn/sandbox

Kaylee's Peer Review
User talk:Bauerkn/sandbox Follow their lead: Yes I am satisfied that I understand the importance of the topic and what it is about. It is clearly defined what each section is going to be discussing and why it is relevant to the overall article. The article is not redundant, it reiterates the topic of each section and gives solid information. A clear structure: The sections are organized in a logical order. It discusses why privacy is important within the United States for confidential births and then the reasons for why it is not a public matter. A balancing act: Nothing is off topic, all the information contributes to the topic of the article. Each section is a good length and provides good evidence. The article discusses the importance of confidential births, but it does not discuss any opposing views on why people would not want births to confidential. Although, I'm not sure why someone would oppose this and if there is any information for the opposing view. The article does not draw any conclusions. The article isn't trying to convince the reader, but it mainly discusses the importance of confidential births. Neutral Content: I feel like I could guess the perspective of the author by reading the article, but I'm not sure if it's actually true. The author is discussing the content in a neutral tone and doesn't try to convince anyone to lean one way. Most of the information is for confidential births. No words or phrases that don't seem neutral. The author only gives named gives named groups to back up the information given. The article doesn't seem positive or negative, it just gives a clear reflection of the information. Reliable sources: Almost all of the information seems like it is from a reliable source, but a source is not given for most of the statements. There are some statements that could use source or reference. All of the sources given are accurately cited.

Overall, these sections for your article are really good! I'm not really sure if you should give an opposing view or not, it doesn't really seem necessary, but I would ask Dr. Smith just in case. Maybe a few more citations for some of the statements. Besides those few things you've done amazing and I can't wait to see how it turns out!