User talk:Bauermill

The article Rush Campbell has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 01:14, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Finley ghost
A tag has been placed on Finley ghost requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Fribbler (talk) 02:11, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Finley ghost
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Finley ghost, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No sources and I couldn't find any -- looks like a hoax.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jfire (talk) 05:44, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Events in Tri-Cities, Washington
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Events in Tri-Cities, Washington, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Events guide for valid only for 1 year

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Passportguy (talk) 20:30, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Recreation in Tri-Cities, Washington
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Recreation in Tri-Cities, Washington, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Travel guide

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Passportguy (talk) 20:33, 1 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Thank you for making these contributions. Unfortunately, they don't quite fit into Wikipedia and had to be deleted.  I would have liked to copy them to WikiTravel, but unfortunately due to licensing restrictions only the original contributor can do so.  If you would like to copy the info there yourself, there are many admins who can supply you with a copy of the article.  See Category:Administrators willing to provide deleted pages or WP:UNDELETE.  Have a nice day, ThaddeusB (talk) 16:09, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Culture in Tri-Cities, Washington


The article Culture in Tri-Cities, Washington has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Indiscriminate list of nonnotable of events and recreational facilities.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cindy ( talk to me ) 15:45, 4 September 2012 (UTC)