User talk:Baumgalo

Spam
By your own admission, you are working for someone. Wikipedia has a policy on paid editing; you should read it. You also, therefore, have a flagrant conflict of interest and should avoid editing where your conflict of interest is relevant. Pinkbeast (talk) 20:38, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

This does not mean that it is paid content! I read the Wikipedia policy and it's not a conflict of interest if I act in the will of the living person being represented on Wikipedia and us. I am not changing the already approved Wikipedia content, but am adding information that we generated by interviewing the artists ourself and adding an external links to even double proof the correctness of the biographies and information! All the other external links to their galleries that represent our artists are also accepted, so I don't understand, why you are deleting our external links! Baumgalo (talk) 10:55, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The policy deals with paid editing. You are editing as part of your job; it is paid editing. Your conflict of interest - promoting this website you spam for - is obvious. Pinkbeast (talk) 13:20, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

So explain to me why the MoMa for example can edit their page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Museum_of_Modern_Art --> they do it for their work as well and you don't delete their page? If I am acting in the will and have the permission of the living artists, this is not spam Baumgalo (talk) 11:38, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I can't see any recent edits on that page that appear to be paid editing, so I have no idea what you're going on about. You are never going to succeed in spamming Wikipedia with links to your own website; give it a rest. Pinkbeast (talk) 12:29, 18 January 2018 (UTC)