User talk:Bavaria

I'm Ba-ack!
Yes, as of December 5, 2005. I am back! After four months of not editing, I simply cannot just read articles, I must be a part of editing again. I will not upload images anymore, because that controversy is what made me stop editing back in August. Thanks- Bavaria 20:09, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Speedy notice
A tag has been placed on Foley Chrysler-Plymouth, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Seraphimblade 06:26, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Wikiproject Automobiles Notification
Hi Bavaria, you were on the list of members at WikiProject Automobiles and we are introducing a new way of listing members, as the old list was becoming too long. Our new method involves having all of our members in a category.

To add yourself to the category just add the userbox to your user page by putting   where you want the userbox. Alternatively if you don't like the userbox you can add   to your userpage.

If you no longer wish to be a member of the project, simply don't add the userbox or category, there's no pressure. Thanks for your time, James086Talk 04:56, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Plymouth
Instead of begining multiple stubs about plymouths, can you make a section under the main article Plymouth (automobile) as you dont have engouh information to write subpages about all the models... thanks! -Sucrine ( &gt;&lt;&gt; talk) 22:35, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, i think its a good idea to make a new article about concept cars... i didnt thought about it. what do you mean by "where i'm coming from"? -Sucrine ( &gt;&lt;&gt; talk) 17:15, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * sorry if i understood it wrong, i'm not a native english... -Sucrine ( &gt;&lt;&gt; talk) 17:45, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Separators in automobile timelines
Please read my answer to your request here. -- NaBUru38 18:42, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Predecessor To Chrysler Fifth Avenue
Who told you the Fifth Avenue replaced the Newport? -- Bull-Doser 20:54, 30 March 2007 (UTC)


 * It says so on the Chrysler Newport article. Bavaria 22:48, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

007GEposter.jpg removed from your user page
An image or media file, Image:007GEposter.jpg, has been removed from your userpage or user talk page because it was licensed as fair use. Wikipedia's fair use policy states that fair use images should only be used in the article namespace. As a result, although users are often given a great amount of latitude in the type of content that is allowed on their user pages, it is requested that you abide by this policy. Feel free, however, to add images and media files licensed under other terms. For more information, see Wikipedia's fair use policy and an accompanying essay on the removal of fair use images. Thank you for your cooperation.

Iamunknown 05:40, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:1994-plymouth-expresso.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:1994-plymouth-expresso.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 10:33, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:99plymouthhowler.jpg
I have tagged Image:99plymouthhowler.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. MER-C 10:50, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Pacifica99.jpg
I have tagged Image:Pacifica99.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Calliopejen1 19:40, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:89plymouth-voyager3.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:89plymouth-voyager3.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:33, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:97plymouthpronto.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:97plymouthpronto.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:34, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:89plymouth-voyager3.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:89plymouth-voyager3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:31, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:89plymouth-voyager3.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:89plymouth-voyager3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:33, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Better source request for File:89plymouth-voyager3.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:89plymouth-voyager3.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:35, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

"Dodge Avenger Concept" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Dodge Avenger Concept and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 8 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Qwv (talk) 13:57, 8 June 2022 (UTC)