User talk:Baville

License tagging for Image:TargetLonglifeMediaPlayer.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:TargetLonglifeMediaPlayer.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 23:11, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Edit Summary
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this: The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. --Geniac 00:57, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Fair use image in user namespace
Hello! You have used a fair use image in your user namespace. Criterion 9 of the Fair use criteria states that "Fair use images may be used only in the article namespace. Used outside article space, they are not covered under the fair use doctrine." I have removed it on these grounds. Sincerely, --Oden 10:29, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:TP Wii GC combined.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:TP Wii GC combined.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 19:28, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Prison Break episodes
Hi, Arman88. I've recently replaced your screenshot of "The Road to Freedom" with another screenshot because I feel that the title screenshot didn't really capture the episode's content. I hope you don't mind. On another note, I noticed that you added the title and summary of the fifteenth episode of the second season. Please note that any information regarding future episodes must be cited with a reliable and veriable source e.g. a Fox press release. The title and summary of the fifteenth episode has not been officially released by Fox yet. Regards, Ladida 00:11, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Preview
I would like to thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thanks again. --Geniac 20:07, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Target Longlife Media Player
Huh? Qutezuce 01:14, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

I realize that Target Longlife is real, that is not why I want it deleted. I feel that both things are not notable enough to be included in Wikipedia. Wikipedia isn't just a collection of every little piece of information you want to put into it. It has standards. A far as the media player not having any connection to MPC, I use your own words to disprove that. In this series of edits you said: "Target Longlife Productions, a Swedish film production company, released their own version of a modified Media Player Classic. Although the source code is originally from the MPC, Target Longlife edited the MPC version with new languages and a new layout." So any claim that the Target Longlife Media Player is unrelated to MPC is false by your own words. Seeing as the media player is only a minor modification of MPC I do not feel that is deserves its own Wikipedia page. If I recompile my own version of MPC but call it "Cat and Mouse Player", and make no other changes then does my new program deserve a Wikipedia page? No it does not. Qutezuce 22:25, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

It's not the content of the article that is the problem, it's the subject of the article. I feel that subject of the two articles in question are not notable enough to be included in Wikipedia. If you feel otherwise feel free to make your case on the associated AFD pages. Qutezuce 23:24, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Thedarkknight_teaserposter.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Thedarkknight_teaserposter.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 19:22, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Princeofpersia sandsoftime promo logo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Princeofpersia sandsoftime promo logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:02, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Stewieandgene.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Stewieandgene.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:00, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Current Events
Regarding your recent edit summary, you're probably looking for, which sticks the following tag on an article:

Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:06, 29 April 2008 (UTC).


 * You're welcome. Also please note that you should use four tildes (like this: ~ ) to sign comments that you stick on talk pages.  Another more specific tag that might be applicable on your article is   .  Happy editing!  Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:14, 29 April 2008 (UTC).

Fair use rationale for Image:Thehappeningposter2.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Thehappeningposter2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? —  pd_THOR  undefined | 17:40, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Thehappeningposter2.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Thehappeningposter2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:31, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Untitled The Dark Knight sequel
I have nominated Untitled The Dark Knight sequel, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Untitled The Dark Knight sequel. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Brougham96 (talk) 18:49, 7 October 2008 (UTC) Brougham96 (talk) 18:49, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Bavil.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Bavil.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?  Veggy  ( talk ) 23:48, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2008
Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Don't upload copyrighted images under free-use tags.  Veggy  ( talk ) 23:49, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Scarecrow-tdk Image
I saw the image you contributed to Scarecrow_comics. (Thanks, by the way. Its awesome!) But I noticed that the image, under "source" it just says "Blu-ray format of the film." If you didn't get it off any website, and you put "Blu-ray format" and it worked, then does that mean you filed it as your own work? Because if it is, I would like to turn the thumbnail of that into a userbox.  What would I have to do to get that? (Because the "license" says that any other uses of the image may be copyright infringement.) I figured that you would know, since you contributed the image. Please help! --CornfieldMannequin (talk) 23:05, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Response from The Scarecrow Image
I did some reading. In the Wikipedia Non-Free use guideline page, it says that Non-Free images can be used again only under certain circumstances. So here's what I think: The guideline allows exceptions. Since you were the one who contributed the image (and it isn't directly from the film, because you had edited it) then you should have the rights to that image. You should therefore be able to use that image whenever you want, so long as you're the one doing it. If you make a userbox out of it, Wikipedia shouldn't delete it. As you can see here each userbox is specified by the user who made it on the left, not by all the other people who have it. See if you can make a good-sized userbox (with a caption about being a fan of the Scarecrow) and log it on the page specified in the link above, with the other Batman ones. I'd really appreciate if you could pull this off.

(By the way, what specifically do you need help with on the copyright thing? I'd be happy to help.) --CornfieldMannequin (talk) 23:04, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

;) yourself, Arman88
Put this in your image file: (Go to Edit mode to select and copy)

You may want to update a few things, like the resolution and stuff. What happened was you put the blockquote information into your Comment section, instead of where it was supposed to be: in your summary. Now at least that thing's fixed. Tell me if you need anything else.

Oh, and could you still do that userbox thing I told you about earlier? That'd be great.--CornfieldMannequin (talk) 00:42, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

I gave you plenty of time
Thanks. Thanks a lot.

I wandered onto your talk page for a reason, Arman88; I wanted a Scarecrow userbox. That's all.

Then you piped in with your copyright problems. I was willing to help, but I still made it clear that I wanted the userbox. I go and give you the blockquote information, and I can see that your file now has this implemented. But no userbox. At first I thought that maybe you needed time to find out how to make a userbox, how to duplicate the image, etc. I gave you plenty of time, and nothing happened.

In short, Arman88, I gave you what you wanted, and I never got what I came for.

If you really can't duplicate the image, at least print screen another Scarecrow image with a free-use license.--CornfieldMannequin (talk) 23:07, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Joker tdk comic.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Joker tdk comic.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 23:33, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Chris Nolan
A discussion was started at Talk:Christopher Nolan about the table you created. You may want to voice your opinion there.  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  03:21, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:John-hinckley-1-.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:John-hinckley-1-.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:30, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Afroturks.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Afroturks.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:47, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

[[File:Picasso blindman.jpg]]
I've just deleted that file. It's an obvious copyright vilation because Pablo Picasso died less than 70 years ago - see the warning box on the Pablo Picasso page at Commons. Please provide an explanation of why you removed the photo of the white cane. I uploaded it and other images for the white cane article, then I later added it to the blindness article because I thought it would be more representative than the painting that was there previously - see this diff. Graham 87 13:39, 17 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Just a note - I'm totally blind myself, as it says on my user page, so I don't really know what I'm doing with images. However the white cane image can't have looked *that* bad on the blindness article if it had stayed up there for nearly a year. Graham 87 13:44, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Scarecrow-tdk.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading File:Scarecrow-tdk.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 23:55, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Ever heard of edit summaries?
ya.. thanks for the explanation. -- &oelig; &trade; 01:54, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Scarecrow-tdk.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Scarecrow-tdk.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 06:00, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Blinding Edge logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Blinding Edge logo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:06, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

October 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Tania Raymonde, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 23:11, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 13
Hi. When you recently edited Culture of Azerbaijan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caucasian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28
Hi. When you recently edited William Hurt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Village (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:24, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Ross Hurman, David Hurman and Dave Katz
Hi, for info: I just traced the text "See also: Ross Hurman, David Hurman and Dave Katz for information" which you pasted into the page Arman (name). It seems to have started as an old bit of vandalism to Herman (name). I think it was deleted from the Herman page ages ago, but survived until now on the Arman page.

You'd probably be more careful these days, but I thought it was worth pointing out anyway! – Fayenatic  L ondon 20:04, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rocky Roberts
Hello, Baville. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Rocky Roberts, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Luke no 94  (talk) 11:36, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Blinding Edge logo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Blinding Edge logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 01:57, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arman (name), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Armando and Armand (name) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Irregularis for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Irregularis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Irregularis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Huon (talk) 22:23, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carl Denham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Armstrong. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reds (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Interstellar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:35, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Draft:The Disaster Artist (film)
There is already an article for The Disaster Artist that is live in the mainspace. I'd recommend you delete your draft and help improve the one that's up. D ARTH B OTTO talk•cont 00:25, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Juliesbiscuits logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Juliesbiscuits logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

February 2017
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Talk:Apple Park, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. PiGuy3 (talk) 18:03, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Prisonbreak tba.jpg


The file File:Prisonbreak tba.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 05:25, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

November 2022
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Jurassic Park (film). Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. ''The change that you made conflicts with what the currently provided source states. If you want to change the listed genres you'll need to provide a source that supports your change.'' DonIago (talk) 23:19, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Irregularis typeface.png


The file File:Irregularis typeface.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused, superseded by c:File:IrregularisSpecimen.png."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 04:42, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Irregularis sampletext.png


The file File:Irregularis sampletext.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused, superseded by c:File:IrregularisSpecimen.png."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 04:42, 24 December 2023 (UTC)