User talk:Bayarkhuu Enkhtaivan Orluud Mongol

August 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Esiymbro (talk) 01:38, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Esiymbro (talk) 01:40, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Khitan people.  General Ization Talk  01:48, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Rouran Khaganate shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  General Ization Talk  01:50, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi Bayarkhuu Enkhtaivan Orluud Mongol! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you.  General Ization Talk  01:52, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Rouran Khaganate. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 02:05, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Kublai Khan, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 22:00, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Dear Sir/Madam

I have not vandalize at all. Wikipedia had an incorrect information entry in the Kublai Khan folder. i changed it to correct informaion. For example, in the article description, it said the Founding Emperor of the Yuan dynasty of China. This is a blatant lie.

Let's follow Wikipedia's rules. “Writing from an outsider's point of view on Wikipedia (writing the generally accepted and obivously truth)”

Regard Bayarkhuu 2A02:8084:A82:A600:E530:C27B:28FB:1ED0 (talk) 22:41, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced, unreliable information to the article Mongolia. The claims in your edit 1125412648 to Mongolia (e.g. "Mongolia and China have always been at war since the beginning of the Asian state until now") should not be included in a factual encyclopedia article. When you are adding or changing information, you must include citations for verfiability. Continuing to add unsourced information back to the article after it has been reverted will constitute Disruptive_editing and may result in you being blocked from editing. modargo (talk) 12:58, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. See Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. modargo (talk) 14:40, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Your bias is the most shameless. My correction is correct. This is the case in many Mongolian and Chinese sources. I will also say that I will take legal action against some unfair writings. Bayarkhuu Enkhtaivan Orluud Mongol (talk) 15:03, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

There is a lot of wrong information in the “Mongolia” article. The largest is the "China proper". This is information that threatens the history and existence of the Mongolian nation and the UN member state. Wikipedia's policy is to write what is generally accepted as the obvious truth. Information that violates this rule includes articles such as Yuan Dynasty and Kublai Khan. We will take this matter to the international court. Thank you. Bayarkhuu Enkhtaivan Orluud Mongol (talk) 15:15, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Acroterion   (talk)   16:03, 4 December 2022 (UTC)