User talk:Bayernbanker

Edits on Valeriya Hontareva
Hi, thank you for your efforts and contributions. However, the content of your edits do not seem very notable or necessary for the article. Also, if you would like to insert references, see WP:CITEFOOT. Guysayshi (talk) 14:08, 25 May 2016 (UTC)Guysayshi

Hi Guysayshi, let the users of Wiki decide if the contents are interesting or not, agree? By asking several colleagues concerning the content I received very positive approvals and feedback. I use just open and serious resources and used also the details in a style comparable for example to the CV the former NBU-Governor Arbuzov. Concerning references - I added them for every sentence. However, ref-function didnt worked at 2 links. FAQ also didnt offered a solution.

Hi, please note that as much as we would like to do whatever we want, Wikipedia is not a place for people to do things as they wish. There are guidelines and rules to adhere to. Some information in the article might not be in accordance to WP:N, but I kept most of your edits now that sources are in place and I've cleaned up the article as well. I'm not very experienced, neither am I error free, so this is all I can do now. I'll leave the rest to an admin to deal with it. Guysayshi (talk) 12:43, 26 May 2016 (UTC)Guysayshi

Hi Guysayshi, I would like to remind you to read the guidelines about BLP by yourself, before you "clean up" contributions! And check, please, if resources are public and reliable. But sorry, its not on you to decide what is fact or not!! Compare for example the CV of the former NBU governor Arbuzov, like I did. I keep straight on approvable facts and would like to ask you to try the same.

Okay, I've read the guidelines. Thank you for the advice. As for the clean up part, it is about correcting phrasings and sentence issues, ( ps. thanks for changing "arise" to "arisen"); see Basic copyediting. I am not here to "decide" on any facts or anything, but instead learn to work with people through Wikipedia. I might have been hasty a few edits back, my apologies. But like I said, aside from sources, see what is really necessary to be in the article. Showing that this person has numerous luxury vehicles is not entirely needed. Guysayshi (talk) 15:18, 27 May 2016 (UTC)Guysayshi

Guysayshi,give the case to an administrator,please. And make an educated guess about indicators about the integrity of heads of national banks.Again you are using your personal and subjective points of view and I want honestly ask you to become a bit more professional.Thx,bayernbanker

Ok. You want me to be more professional. Start with working on punctuation. Where's the spacing after the comma? Then there's the "luxury cars" part. Yeah readers need to know she has several Porsche vehicles. I want to know whether she uses an iPhone or something else. You said you asked your colleagues for their opinion. Are they experts in this subject field? If yes, source please? I am trying to take it easy here. Please. Guysayshi —Preceding undated comment added 08:17, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Guysashi,you want to play like in kindergarden?Then I may not prevent to do so...but dont steal MY time,agree?Please dont disturb people,which want to share knowledge,which is approved by serious sources.This is the sense of wikipedia,isnt it? Best regards and have a relaxed day..maybe with some aeroplanes,o.k.?Bayernbanker

Check your own reply. Come to Wikipedia to contribute constructively. Guysayshi (talk) 09:47, 7 June 2016 (UTC)Guysayshi

Guysayshi,you started with kommata....!Dont feel offended,if somebody uses your style. I want to point out,that YOU deleted infos with sources WITHOUT reasons. I also dont care,if Hontareva has 2 children, however, if its true, I will not delete. Maybe this example may show you, which kind of professionalism I expected from you. have a nice day and calm down, bayernbanker

You missed my apology in my earlier reply. I had apologised for being hasty on reverting edits to fight vandalism. And I had apologised for my mistake. You have been a bit rude this whole time so please check your editing first. Also, you have to be grammatically correct on Wikipedia to "expect" others to be as professional as you are. Guysayshi (talk) 10:18, 7 June 2016 (UTC)Guysayshi

Guysayshi, if I would see space after kommata as necessary to correct, I may do nothing else anymore. If you will have time for this, feel free to do it))!Have a nice, sunny day and relax)!Bayernbanker


 * You have a good day. Guysayshi (talk) 01:34, 10 June 2016 (UTC)Guysayshi

Kiev/Kyiv
The current consensus is to use Kiev as per the article which has a special page for suggesting a rename at Talk:Kiev/naming. If the article is renamed then we can change any other references but only if the article is moved. Just out of interest this naming issues was a problem with regard to Burma/Myanamar which was turned down on many occassions but eventually it was agreed that the English usage had changed and that article was moved, this may happen to the Kiev article when enough English sources are shown to use Kyiv, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 20:44, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Dear MilborneOne, at the suggesting-site, which you referred, there are a lot of suggestions to rename to Kyiv, like official authorities are using - so, why it wasnt done?? Please explain me "consensus" - of WHOM? Of you? If there is a internationally official transliteration KYIV - this is a CONSENSUS in my eyes! Also sent you a mail concerning your deletion of contributions at "UIA" without explanation or feedback.Thanks a lot in advance, Bayernbanker


 * It hasnt been done yet because a majority of users here dont support the change of name, you need to read the discussions on the Kiev talk page. All it needs is a majority of users on that page to agree to the change, consensus from those users is to use Kiev, I am just following the agreed consensus and usage. MilborneOne (talk) 15:38, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

milborneone,I red the discussion...and saw several requests for changing to KYIV-you have another wiki than I have?? Take also notice about the renaming of DNIPRO, please. If to follow a single logic, there is just one binding - the legal one.Bayernbanker (talk) 07:13, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Non-notable incidents
I have raised the subject of the addition of non-notable incidents on the article talk page at Talk:Ukraine International Airlines, you need to discuss it there. Re-adding the content and calling it vandalism will probably not help your argument we prefer to discuss stuff here and edit warring can be seen as being disruptive, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 15:38, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

MilborneOne - its vandalism for me, if you are several times deleting infos with verified links, which are showing the same information like portraits of other airlines (I told you - look to austrian and fokker 70 and make a educated guess about your logic...). Simply have to state, that I am not impressed about your "professionalism" and performance as admin...Bayernbanker (talk) 16:10, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Warning
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Bayernbanker. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. You need to desist such behaviour or you will be blocked from editing, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 16:19, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

MilborneOne, I argumented with you and if I may not express critics on your, in my point of view, not correct behavior - block me! If this is the behavior of admins of Wikipedia - its not worth it:-). Enjoy life and dont judge about others!Bayernbanker (talk) 16:28, 4 August 2016 (UTC))!


 * I dont have a problem with a dicussion or the fact we may not agree but No personal attacks is policy and it guides the way we behave, if you continue to attack other editors like you did above then you will be blocked. If you want to continue to contribute then please read WP:NPA and learn how you should treat others, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 16:40, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, I didnt started to delete contributions without explanation like you did...Think about your own behavior,please. Block me if you want, I dont have a problem with it.Bayernbanker (talk) 16:42, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I have reverted your additon of unnotable events at Ukraine International Airlines. If you continue the reversion without further discussions at the article's talk I will report you to an admin.--Jetstreamer $Talk$ 13:59, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

jetstreamer,report it please.I also noted the missing logic in the deletion and referred to the contribution at comparable airlines (austrian).its also not your personal decision,what is worth to note and what not,correct? Hope just,that you are not the 2nd nick of milborneone as you appeared with the same behavior at the same time of the day.And - why you are not deleting simple runway overruns at aerolinas argentinas, but this ones of UIA???Bayernbanker (talk) 07:12, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

concerning milborne one-I red the guidelines and cannot see any attack on you,sorry. however, you violated them by deleting content without feedback and discussion.so,which admin has to be appealed?Bayernbanker (talk) 07:12, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dat GuyTalkContribs 13:33, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi DatGuy, please delete my editing rights as I dont plan anymore to give any contribution or donation to wikipedia. Thx,Bayernbanker (talk) 08:59, 9 August 2016 (UTC)