User talk:Bayfinch

September 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Managed Print Services appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 14:51, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * However, in this case it is the original Managed Print Services content that is far from objective and appears to have a strong SPIN towards OEM programs that are supported by less than fully capable select solutions throughout. Managed Services throughout the IT sector are largely independent and are not dominated by hardware manufacturers or simple hosted monitoring systems.  The current Managed Print Service content is clearly written with an agenda.  There is a 5th Group as added yesterday.  Unlike the 4 other groups conveniently detailed this group does not sell product, supplies, or high cost services, but rather provides higher value to the end user and is growing at a much higher rate than the other categories.  Independent Managed Print Service vendors provide unbiased multi-brand service delivery and supply chain management technology, specialist experience, and professional services to enable all four other categories.

Ironically over 60% of the organisations named in the four categories are supported by; EKM4, Bayfinch, and Kanban MPS as examples of such IMPS vendors. Naming them is no different to naming Canon or Xerox!

IMPS vendors are synonymous with IT business service management vendors who support MSP's (CA, BMC, Axios etc.) As such we will create a new and separate Managed Print Services Wiki site.
 * Thank you for your response. It would be great to have you work on the article to improve it.  Putting in additional content as you have proposed to do sounds like a good idea if you can provide reliable source coverage to verify the claims you have made.  Additionally such language should be phrased in a neutral tone.  Good luck with your editing!  ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 14:29, 11 September 2011 (UTC)