User talk:Bbatiz64

January 2010
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you have been adding your signature to some of your article contributions. This is a simple mistake to make and is easy to correct. For future reference, the need to associate edits with users is taken care of by an article's edit history. Therefore, you should use your signature only when contributing to talk pages, the Village Pump, or other such discussion pages. For a better understanding of what distinguishes articles from these type of pages, please see What is an article?. Again, thank you for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Thank you. JulieSpaulding (talk) 14:16, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Automated teller machine. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the [ page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Scjessey (talk) 14:26, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Scjessey (talk) 14:31, 19 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Please also be aware that it is completely inappropriate to use sources that you have created yourself as references for Wikipedia articles. -- Scjessey (talk) 14:33, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

I am providing you with sources to meet "A vital component: good research Good and unbiased research, based upon the best and most reputable authoritative sources available, helps prevent NPOV disagreements. Try the library for reputable books and journal articles, and look for the most reliable online resources."

Cant see why there is a conflict of interest.

Bbatiz64 (talk) 14:39, 19 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Here's why there was a COI, or at least a concern about your sourcing:
 * You used that reference in your previous edit, which appeared to be self-published work. -- Scjessey (talk) 15:47, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * You used that reference in your previous edit, which appeared to be self-published work. -- Scjessey (talk) 15:47, 19 January 2010 (UTC)