User talk:Bbbgsr

February 2023
Hello, I'm Moops. I noticed that you recently removed content from Great Migrations of the Serbs without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Blanking as part of an edit war. Please do not remove such large swathes of cited content'' — Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 21:15, 26 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Moops, I always put Edit comments and give quite understandable justification for why I do that. Nobody reads it!
 * Why does an article dealing with Migrations of Serbs (next to all the areas Serbs were migrating from and even more of those they migrated to) spends 50% of the whole article text in the last section to cover the topic of Albanians being autochthonous population in Kosovo. This is very biased and not acceptable.
 * Why do you keep reverting the changes without reading my Edit comments? The section content is off topic and biased. It doesn't matter it contains some references to sources it prefers. BbBgSr (talk) 21:33, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
 * For the record, I I did ONE revert on Great Migrations of the Serbs. So I don't know what you are talking about with "...Why do you keep reverting the changes"? — Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 21:34, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Because every day somebody from US or UK reverts the change immediately without reading the Edit note. Yesterday it was Saintstephen000 and he does not reply do Talk pre-posts and also does not read my Edit notes.
 * I will kindly repeat: why does an article dealing with Migrations of Serbs (that encompasses many regions) spend 50% of the whole article text in the last section to provide proofs that Albanians are the autochthonous population of Kosovo ? That is completely off topic without any discussion on validity of that statement. BbBgSr (talk) 21:40, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

New message from Vanjagenije
 Vanjagenije  (talk)  23:27, 26 February 2023 (UTC)