User talk:Bbcesq

Welcome!

Hello, Bbcesq, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Urban logic, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Visik (talk) 06:34, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Your contributed article, Urban logic


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Urban logic. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Urban Logic. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Urban Logic - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Visik (talk) 06:34, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Urban Logic


The article Urban Logic has been &#32; because of the following concern:
 * no evidence of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &mdash; RHaworth 18:47, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

bbcesq response: I have removed the notice for Urban Logic and object to the concern raised of "no evidence of notability," for the following reasons:

(Bruce Cahan 22:38, 7 January 2011 (UTC))
 * The Urban Logic article explains the chronology of Urban Logic, as researching and supplying the initiative to shift existing paradigms so as to improve the public's access to free available geospatial information in New York City and across the United States.
 * As the article shares, the work in New York City was valuable especially during and in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 World Trade Center Attacks.
 * The lessons learned from 9/11 were requested by NSF to to shared, and Urban Logic co-authored reports sharing such lessons with Center for Technology in Government, which it should be noted has a similar Wikipedia article.
 * Various external links and inline citations in the Urban Logic article are government and academic publications proving the role, reputation and notability of Urban Logic's unique finance and technology approach to addressing tough urban challenges.
 * As this in my first Wikipedia article and I have dystonia (a neuromuscular condition), it is taking me a bit longer to convert and expand inline citations to Wikipedia-formated footnotes as references.
 * If you require any further information, please feel free to contact me at

Unblocked
Hi Bbcesq, I've unblocked your account and communicated with the blocking administrator. Your username does not, in my opinion, represent a violation of our username policy. - Philippe 01:58, 25 April 2011 (UTC)