User talk:Bblackmond7/Gender archaeology

Overall, this article is a decent overview of the topic at hand, but it suffers from disorganization and a sloppy writing style that interrupts the flow and makes it hard to keep up with. The phrasing of certain thoughts and the overall organization could use a bit of work. The lead is understandable, but not always well-stated or entirely clear. I would suggest tweaking some of the more odd phrasing and making the language more grammatically and less clunky. The next part, Theory, seems a bit wordy while lacking substance, and might benefit from some reorganization or a reduction and distilling into gender archaeology’s few key ideas (with superfluous information being injected into more appropriate sections). The history section seems alright in terms of size and content. I would recommend including more criticism, if you can find it, and moving that section to the end (or otherwise reducing the size of that section by trimming or paraphrasing the quote). The “Gender archaeology and cross cultural studies” could use a renaming, and perhaps some sub headers to better organize the ideas. I’m also unsure about whether in-text citations in parentheses are appropriate for wikipedia’s formatting standards. Strangfeldaa (talk) 06:44, 2 October 2020 (UTC)