User talk:Bbundu

August 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Summerslam (2015). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Vjmlhds 02:16, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Enough.
Seriously...quit removing the "winner take all" phrase. The phrase is used to let people know that the winner will get both titles so there is no confusion.

"Winner Take All" is a common phrase, and WWE itself used it to describe the match, so please quit removing it from the match description.

Thank you. Vjmlhds (talk) 12:58, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Summerslam (2015), you may be blocked from editing. Vjmlhds 14:32, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Redirects
Greetings,

I noticed that you added some "piped" links to the TakeOver article such as Apollo Crewes. The guidelines on WP:REDIRECT actually state that we should avoid those when the redirect is sufficient, so since Apollo Crewes redirects to Uhaa Nation you should not add the additional link, Apollo Crewes is sufficient and less confusing to someone not well versed in Wikipedia coding. Please leave the redirects be, they get to the right article after all. Thank you.  MPJ  -US 02:29, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * and how about WP:RED, seems appropriate too.  MPJ  -US  10:58, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

I would ask you once again to read over the guidelines i posted. Your edits to NXT TakeOver: Brooklyn go against guidelines on piped links and red links. Further breach of those policies cannot be considered to in Good Faith but to be WP:Disruptive editing instead of constructive eidts. Please take a moment to read them over and let me know if you disagree with my take on the policies. Collaborative editing is the cornerstone of Wikipedia so.i am trying to.work with you instead of a revert war.  MPJ  -US 14:15, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

I am trying to see your reasoning here but I am not seeing what a willful Ignorance of the rules do for you? And for what? So it says "Prince Devitt"? Please stop doing that, I really don't want to report you but disruptive editing wastes everyone's time.So please stop.  MPJ  -US 23:49, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

AJ Styles
A.J. Styles has held the PWG Title one time during his career. He won the title on April 2, 2005 and lost it August 6, 2005. At that time it was known as the PWG Championship. It did not become the PWG World Championship until February 2006 during PWG's European tour under Joey Ryan's reign that started on December 3, 2005, months after Styles had already lost the belt to Kevin Steen. Please stop changing what he has listed the title under because it is not factual.-- Will C  09:51, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Again, I state that Styles won the title as the PWG Championship, before it had World in its name.-- Will C  04:37, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

July 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at UFC 200. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. JC &middot;&#32; Talk &middot;&#32; Contributions 00:28, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

WWE Universal Championship
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at WWE Universal Championship. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. There has been no title image released. Chris &#34;WarMachineWildThing&#34; (talk) 04:26, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at WWE Universal Championship, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Do not add crap you made up again. And stop adding your personal opinion to WWE World Championship. oknazevad (talk) 04:36, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Final warning
Do not produce hoax images composed of copyrighted logos and images and edit war to insert them into an article. --Neil N  talk to me 04:43, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Warning
Do not wikilink article section heads. That's not WP:MOS.  Crash Under  ride  03:01, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

This is your only warning Do not wikilink article section heads like you continue to do on AJ Styles. That's not WP:MOS youve been told several times Chris &#34;WarMachineWildThing&#34; (talk) 09:43, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at A.J. Styles.  Crash Under  ride  02:51, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I mean seriously, what do you not get??? The WWE Network sub section of the Styles article is not supposed to be linked. Sub section headings are never to be linked. Only text in the body of the article. How hard is that to get?  Crash Under  ride  03:10, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  05:54, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Advice
I noticed your most recent edit to A.J. Styles. I would like to recommend that you read MOS:NOPIPE. Please also check out other guidlines to avoid getting blocked, again. Best wishes,  Crash Under  ride  16:34, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

WWE World Championship
If you don't know how to fix something that someone messes up leave it alone for someone who knows how to fix it. Your edits did nothing but make the article unstable. Chris "WarMachineWildThing"  Talk to me 00:56, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

AJ Styles
It's listed as AJ NOT A.J. on WWE.com. If you continue to add it as A.J. I will seek admin intervention. Stop. Chris "WarMachineWildThing"  Talk to me 02:08, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm with WarMachine, you've been in trouble before over disruptive editing, you should know better. (talk page stalker)  Crash Under  ride  02:12, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
 * You've been reported for disruptive editing. (talk page stalker)  Crash Under  ride  02:17, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at List of WWE World Champions. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Chris "WarMachineWildThing"  Talk to me 02:19, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Neil N  talk to me 02:23, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Neil N  <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 02:27, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Lots of notices and warnings. Zero talk page posts from you anywhere. Extra long block to see if you can actually communicate with your fellow editors. --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 02:29, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Just to be clear, even posting an unblock request would be a step in the right direction. --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 05:51, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Your edits
Read WP:NOTBROKEN and MOS:NOPIPE and stop it with these stupid edits already. I've warned you enough times. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen)  (ZOOM)  22:15, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to A.J. Styles, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. <b style="color:Red">Chris "WarMachineWildThing" </b> Talk to me 22:46, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

WWE Championship
The title name has been changed they removed World from the name per WWE.com. So stop changing it. <b style="color:Red">Chris "WarMachineWildThing" </b> Talk to me 00:05, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Basically the same issue. You keep reverting this. It was the WWE World Championship when he won the title and was that until last week when they changed it to WWE Championship. My edits cover this yet you keep reverting it. -- JDC808  ♫  03:37, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

I said it in my edit summary, but I'll say it here again. Do I need to seek administrative action? You are blatantly ignoring me and not giving any valid reason for your edits. -- JDC808  ♫  03:51, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

So admin action it is. I warned you, and you still reverted, grant it, only a partial revert, but a revert nonetheless, and you did not explain why. You could have prevented this. -- JDC808  ♫  03:58, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. JDC808  ♫  04:23, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring and failure to communicate. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Someguy1221 (talk) 04:31, 14 December 2016 (UTC)