User talk:Bch7677/sandbox

Peer Review: -Although you don't have your information formatted as an article yet, you do a very good job of providing a lot of facts and information that do not bore the reader, I was very fascinated reading all of your information that you currently have. -A change I would suggest (which you probably already figured) would be to format your information into an article. It would have been nice to see how your sections and subsections build off one another. -One important improvement would be to have a clear purpose of what your article is meant for/ trying to inform about. This will probably come automatically from you putting all your information into real article style. -Personally, I like the number of facts/research your article in progress contains. I might take this liking as feedback for myself to include more facts and research that is interesting and nuanced as the ones you included.

What does the article (or section) do well? - This piece has a large selection of information to draw from, once compiled it will likely be very informative. What changes would you suggest overall? - Overall, I would suggest prioritizing numerical/definitive citations for what you are talking about, as while quotes are helpful they are not necessarily definite. What is the most important thing that the author could do to improve his/her contribution? - I recommend dividing information into sections that will become paragraphs in your final draft. Did you glean anything from your classmate's work that could be applicable to your own? If so, let him/her know! - Your mind map design is very informative and it would be good for me to use in future projects. TylerT33 (talk) 19:21, 31 March 2022 (UTC)