User talk:Bchianca

February 2022
Hello Bchianca. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Bchianca. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. MrOllie (talk) 20:49, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi, Mr. Ollie! I'm not being compensated by the editing. Please guide me on the needed editions on the first text so I can ajust and re-submit it. Kindly, Bchianca. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bchianca (talk • contribs)


 * It is hard to imagine why you would turn the article into an advertisement (with wording such as a 'Young and bold brand') if you aren't being paid. But if that is truly the case, please read WP:NPOV, WP:PUFFERY and write neutrally in the future. You should not 'adjust and resumbit it' because it was an advertisement from top to bottom and was not an improvement on the older version of the article. - MrOllie (talk) 13:35, 9 February 2022 (UTC)


 * To be honest, and I don't mean to be disrespectful, I'm not sure if you read the same version that I wrote. It was clearly an improvement and brought many updates and new informations. The adjectives are the ones the brand uses in their materials and can be checked on the references. It's frustrating to spend some hours writing and researching just to have everything reverted from an accusation. Anyway, I'll do my best to make it as neutral as possible and resubmit it when I have some free time. Thanks for your feedback. - Bchianca (talk) 13:42, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Copying and pasting the brand's advertisements does not somehow mean that it isn't advertising here. MrOllie (talk) 13:55, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
 * It came from independant press organizations, not the advertisements. Bchianca (talk) 14:04, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Reposted press releases are still marketing. MrOllie (talk) 14:09, 9 February 2022 (UTC)