User talk:Bcnelson16

DFW Page
As I said, the next step is to discuss it on the talk page of the DFW article. I will offer this, first, much of that same material is already covered in the first paragraph of the Themes and style section. Second, your edit is written as a personal essay. I am not going to spend any time whatsoever rewriting editors' personal essays to make them fit. Third, and most important, unlike the other points in that section your edit only used DFW and your analysis to make up the content. On Wikipedia we have a very strong preference for secondary sources who report on what primary sources state. So if you had a published source that is also a reliable source who makes those claims, then with some cleanup (to make it sound encyclopedic), the content of your edit would be appropriate for Wikipedia.

But please don't discuss the issue further here or on my talk page, take it to the DFW talk page so that others can join in. SQGibbon (talk) 20:04, 30 April 2015 (UTC)